MedPath

Comparative Analysis in Detection of Atrial Arrhythmia and ECG Quality in Three Different Insertable Cardiac Monitors

Not Applicable
Conditions
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Registration Number
NCT04471584
Lead Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
Brief Summary

Comparative analysis of available ILR devices models Abbot Confirm RxTM, Medtronic Reveal LINQTM, and Biotronik BIOMONITOR., evaluating detection performance and effective of transmission of these devices to better understand the differences between them.

Detailed Description

All devices have different algorithms for arrhythmia detection and structural design. Consequently, these devices vary in sensitivity of arrhythmia detection and data transmission.Therefore, we aim to expand a comparative analysis of available devices, evaluating detection performance and effective of transmission of these devices to better understand the differences between them.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria

Patients > 18 years of age with appropriate indication for ILR for atrial arrhythmia management.

Exclusion Criteria

Inability to give consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Positive predictive values of device detected atrial arrhythmias12 months

Positive predictive values of device detected atrial arrhythmias

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

🇺🇸

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
🇺🇸Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Donita Atkins
Contact
816-651-1969
datkins@kchrf.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.