跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02633319
NCT02633319已完成不适用

Malezi ne Kilimo Bora (Good Parenting and Farming) - Skilful Parenting and Agribusiness Child Abuse Prevention Study (SPACAPS)

University of Oxford1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 248 人开始时间: 2015年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
248
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in Child Abuse - Parent Report

研究概览

简要总结

The Malezi ne Kilimo Bora ("Good Parenting and Farming" in Kiswahili) Skilful Parenting and Agribusiness Child Abuse Prevention Study is a collaboration between the University of Oxford, University of Glasgow, and the Tanzania National Medical Research Institute (NIMR). It is pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) of a community-based intervention implemented by Investing in Children and Our Societies (ICS), an international non-governmental organization (NGO) with extensive experience operating in rural Tanzania. The overall focus of the project is to evaluate ICS's agribusiness and skilful parenting programmes' impact on the prevention of child maltreatment and improvement of child and family psychosocial and economic wellbeing (n = 8 villages, n = 16 farmer groups, n = 240 families).

详细描述

Background on Child Maltreatment in Tanzania

Child maltreatment and other childhood adversities often occur in many low- and middle-income countries at rates that are higher than in high-income countries - rates that often exceed 50%. In Tanzania, a national survey examining violence against children (VAC) found that almost 73.5% of females and 71.7% of males between the ages of 13 and 24 had experienced physical violence by prior to the age of 18. Furthermore, 23.6% of females and 27.5% of males had experienced emotional violence by an adult during childhood, and 27.9% of females and 13.4% of males had experienced some form of sexual violence before the age of 18 years. In addition, the survey identified an overlap among physical, emotional, and sexual violence against children. Approximately 80% of respondents who experienced sexual violence also experienced physical violence as a child, and nearly all children who experienced physical violence also experienced emotional violence. The VAC study also found that parents and other adult relatives are the most commonly reported perpetrators of physical and emotional violence against children, with corporal punishment considered a social norm.

Recent advances in neuroscience, genomics, developmental psychology, epidemiology, and economics have shed light on the long-term and far-reaching consequences of childhood adversities, many of which, like child maltreatment, are directly related to poor parenting. These consequences include serious physical and mental health problems later in life, as well as difficulties in school, jobs, and relationships. Child maltreatment can have substantial intergenerational effects in which some parents who experienced maltreatment during childhood are more vulnerable to the risk of maltreating their own children. Child maltreatment is also a risk factor for later intimate partner violence, increased risk of HIV-infection, and transactional sex amongst AIDS-affected youth. Furthermore, not only is child maltreatment a serious public health and human rights issue, but it comes at an economic cost due to expenses relating to the treatment of victims' health problems, criminal justice and welfare costs, and lower economic productivity.

The risks factors of child maltreatment can be best understood using an ecological framework. A recent review of 23 quantitative studies in Africa by Meinck et al identified a number of child, family, and social risk factors for child maltreatment. Child factors associated with increased likelihood of physical abuse included younger children, boys, children with disability or chronic illness, child behaviour problems, and school non-attendance and poor performance. Family-level factors include caregiver chronic illness, HIV/AIDS, caregiver mental health problems, caregiver disability, domestic violence, substance abuse, poor family functioning, and inconsistent parenting. Finally, household poverty and low socioeconomic status was found to be a major factor for increased risk of child abuse, as well as indirectly through increased family stress and reduced parental involvement.

Parenting Programmes to Prevent Child Maltreatment

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Child Abuse - Parent Report

时间窗: Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up

Child abuse will be measured using adapted versions of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool-Parent version (ICAST-P), a multi-national and consensus-based survey instrument measuring the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect. This 19-item scale ICAST-P was validated in 6 LMIC and 7 languages (α = 0.77-0.88) and measures four types of abuse: physical, emotional and sexual abuse, as well as neglect. In this study, the response code was adapted to a frequency scale from 0 to more than 8 times as certain behaviour occurred in the past month. In this study, incidence child maltreatment will be scored as dichotomous variables for physical, verbal, and sexual abuse, as well as an overall indication of previous child abuse (0 = no abuse; 1 = previous abuse). The investigators will also assess frequency of overall abuse by summing all of the subscales as well as for each individual subscale.

Change in Child Abuse - Child Report

时间窗: Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up

Child report of child abuse will be measured using adapted versions of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool-Child version (ICAST-C), a multi-national and consensus-based survey instrument measuring the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect. This 32-item scale ICAST-C was validated in 6 LMIC and 7 languages (α = 0.77-0.88) and measures four types of abuse: physical, emotional and sexual abuse, as well as neglect. In this study, the response code was adapted to a frequency scale from 0 to more than 8 times as certain behaviour occurred in the past month. In this study, incidence child maltreatment will be scored as dichotomous variables for physical, verbal, and sexual abuse, as well as an overall indication of previous child abuse (0 = no abuse; 1 = previous abuse). The investigators will also assess frequency of overall abuse by summing all of the subscales as well as for each individual subscale.

Change in Parenting Behaviour - Child Report

时间窗: Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up

Parent-child interaction, will be measured using the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire - Child Report (42 items). The APQ contains five subscales assessing Positive Parenting (8 items), Parent Involvement (8 items), Inconsistent Discipline (11 items), Poor Supervision (10 items), and Harsh Discipline (5 items). The APQ has been shown to have moderate to strong internal reliability for both parent and child reports (Cronbach's α = 0.50 to 0.89). It has been used widely including in LMIC such as South Africa and Mexico. Children report on the frequency of parenting behaviour based on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = never; 3 = Often, more than 5 times). Items are summed to create total frequency score (range 0 to 126) as well as for each subscale.

Change in Parenting Behaviour - Adult Report

时间窗: Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up

Parent-child interaction, will be measured using the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) - Adult Report (37 items). The APQ contains five subscales assessing Positive Parenting (8 items), Parent Involvement (8 items), Inconsistent Discipline (11 items), Poor Supervision (10 items). The APQ has been shown to have moderate to strong internal reliability for both parent and child reports (Cronbach's α = 0.50 to 0.89). It has been used widely including in LMIC such as South Africa and Mexico. Caregivers report on the frequency of parenting behaviour based on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = never; 3 = Often, more than 5 times). Items are summed to create total frequency score (range 0 to 81) as well as for each subscale.

次要结局

  • Change in Infant/Toddler Weight(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Parenting Stress - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change Child Behaviour - Child Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Intimate partner Violence - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child Labor - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Agricultural Assets - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Household Assets - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Parental Attitudes to Punishment(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Caregiver Depression - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change Child Behaviour - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Household Hunger - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child Development - Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Infant/Toddler Height(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child food consumption - Child report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child labour - Child report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child Attitudes to Punishment(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Early Childhood Home Environment - Observed and Adult Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Household Hunger - Child Report(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child Alcohol Use(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Adult Alcohol Use(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child Depression(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)
  • Change in Child Sexual Behavior(Baseline; 6-Months Follow-Up; 12-Months Follow-Up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验