An Investigation Into the Safety, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Brief Compassion-Focused Intervention for People Who Experience Distressing Mood Swings: A Case Series.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 6
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)(Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this case series is to investigate whether a brief compassion-focused intervention is a safe, acceptable and feasible therapy for clients with bipolar affective disorder. The secondary questions are whether a brief compassion focused intervention for BPD clients is associated with changes in bipolar mood symptoms and/ or with changes in psychological processes linked to mood symptoms in bipolar, including: Self-compassion, perfectionism, social comparison and social safeness. Four visual analogue scales will also be completed daily by each participant throughout the project. These scales will measure domains relevant to BPAD symptomology and self-compassion.
Participants will complete a 4 session Compassion-Focused Therapy Intervention. The first session will involve completion of the psychoeducation and formulation work which was started during the initial assessment session. Each intervention session will also involve the introduction and practice of CFT techniques or exercises. The trial therapist will introduce the exercise and practice it together with the participant during the session. Participants will then be asked to continue practicing the exercises for homework. Their experience of the practice and any difficulties can then be discussed at the start of the next session.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adults (18 years and older)
- •Diagnosis of Bipolar Affective Disorder
排除标准
- •Client considered to be actively at acute risk - judgement made by responsible clinical team and also by risk assessment at our first assessment session. High risk clients are excluded as due to time constraints it will be difficult to address risk issues and complete the intervention in the short time frame we have outlined.
- •Client already receiving some form of CFT intervention, as this be a potential confounder.
- •Level of English not strong enough to complete assessment and intervention sessions without use of interpreter. Again, due to time constraints it would be difficult to complete the intervention with clients in the timeframe outline whilst using an interpreter or navigating the language barrier.
结局指标
主要结局
the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)(Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
时间窗: Assessment/Baseline Only
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) (Larsen, Attkison, Hargreaves & Nguyen, 1979).
时间窗: Follow-up (2 weeks post-intervention)
次要结局
- The Social Comparison Scale (Allan & Gilbert, 1995)(Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention))
- internal states scale (ISS) (Bauer, 1991)(Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention))
- The Self Compassion Scale Short Form(SCS-SF) (Raes, Pommier, Neff & Van Gucht, 2011)(Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention))
- The Short Revised Almost Perfect Scale (SAPS) (Rice, Richardson & Tueller, 2014)(Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention))
- The Social Safeness and Pleasure Scale (Gilbert et al, 2009)(Assessment (Baseline) and Follow-Up (2 weeks post intervention))
研究者
Tom Marsay
Trainee Clinical Psychologist
Institute of Psychiatry, London