Design development,Biomechanical validation and Clinical evaluation of a novel miniplate design for Mandible angle fracture management:Two phase study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 28
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- evaluate and compare new design miniplate efficacy biomechanically and clinically.
研究概览
简要总结
The angle is one of the most frequent fractured sites after traumatic events involving the mandible.The optimal treatment of angle fractures remains controversial. Biomechanical studies on champy’s technique revealed that single miniplate on superior border has least resistance to lateral displacement and torsional force. Placement of two miniplate needs intraoral and extraoral approach/transbuccal approach. This practice increases periosteal stripping and compromises blood supply. Simultaneous intraoral and extraoral approach/transbuccal approach increases the risk of bacterial contamination , infection, increases operating time, risk of facial nerve injury and hypertrophic scar. The proposed research project aims to develop a novel single miniplate design that can be easily adapt and fix across fracture segments of mandible angle in biplanar fashion by intraoral approach. It shouId have minimal implant volume, but provides optimal biomechanical stability, functional stability and patient tolerance.
Objective To design a new miniplate system for mandible angle fracture management, evaluate and compare its efficacy biomechanically and clinically.
Study design-Two stage study
Stage 1: Randomised control trial using Computational mandible models & polyurethane mandible models.
Evaluation and comparison of biomechanical stability and stress distribution of miniplate, screws and underlying bone using Finite element analysis. Validation of biomechanical characteristics using UTM machine.
Stage 2: Randomised control clinical trial
Patients with Mandible angle fracture are selected into group A and B. Group A: Single straight miniplate fixation group(conventional) Group B: New miniplate design fixation group
Treatment outcome(Plate fixation time, Neurosensory function, Wound healing status) and Functional stability assessment are assessed and compared in both groups.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Is there any difference in biomechanical stability and clinical efficacy between single miniplate and new miniplate design for mandible angle fracture management?
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients with Mandible angle fracture.
- •Patients of age group 18-60yrs
- •Patient under ASA I & ASA II.
排除标准
- •1.Patients with comminuted fracture at angle region.
- •Patients under ASA III & ASA IV
- •Patients with gross infection.
- •4.Patients who are not fit for surgery.
- •Oral submucous fibrosis patients(OSMF)
- •Patient who is not willing to participate.
结局指标
主要结局
evaluate and compare new design miniplate efficacy biomechanically and clinically.
时间窗: 4year
次要结局
- • To validate and compare the biomechanical behaviour of new miniplate system with conventional system.
研究者
Dr Manju Kurakar
Sinhgad Dental college and hospital Pune
