Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05848557
NCT05848557RecruitingNot Applicable

mSaada: A Mobile Health Tool to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya

Duke University1 site in 1 country6,000 target enrollmentStarted: February 19, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
6,000
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Proportion of women in each arm who complete cervical cancer screening

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In the R21 phase of this project, investigators will: (1) work with key stakeholders and local and international developers to finalize the mSaada platform, building on the existing prototype to add patient and specimen tracking functionality; and (2) carry out a pilot to identify the patient, provider and health system factors necessary to design a trial to evaluate mSaada effectiveness in assisting community health volunteer-led home-based HPV screening, and implementation factors. Investigators will carry out a six-month pilot of mSaada with community units in two health facilities providing HPV-based screening, and use performance metrics including system usage rates, workflow observations and qualitative data to guide the planning of a to determine effectiveness.

In the R33 phase of the project, investigators plan to: (1) conduct an 18-month c-RCT across 12 health facilities to determine the impact of mSaada on cervical cancer screening uptake, treatment acquisition and cervical cancer knowledge levels among women in the community; and (2) measure the requisite implementation factors for mSaada effectiveness, sustainability, and scale-up. The rigorous study design will allow us to determine the clinical impact of mSaada, ensure the local and regional infrastructure has the capacity necessary for sustainability and develop strategies for widespread implementation and scale-up. Collaboration with key stakeholders from the Kenya Ministry of Health will facilitate the development of a long-term sustainability plan as the country moves toward HPV-based cervical cancer screening. Investigators anticipate the mSaada platform will play a pivotal role in facilitating the introduction of HPV-based screening programs that can reach women in settings with limited health care infrastructure.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Screening
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Aim 1 Community health volunteers (CHVs), facility providers and supervisors, Ministry of Health officials
  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •18 years or older
  • •be employed by a government clinic
  • •be working in cervical cancer screening

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Does not understand the study purpose and details
  • •Is not willing to provide informed consent
  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •- between 30 and 65 years old
  • •Exclusion Criteria:
  • •Does not understand the study purpose and details
  • •Is not willing to provide informed consent
  • •Aim 2 Community health volunteers (CHVs)
  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •18 years or older
  • •be employed by a government clinic
  • •be working in cervical cancer screening
  • •Exclusion Criteria:
  • •Does not understand the study purpose and details
  • •Is not willing to provide informed consent
  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •between 30 and 65 years old
  • •intact cervix and uterus
  • •able to provide informed consent.
  • •Exclusion Criteria:
  • •Does not understand the study purpose and details
  • •Is not willing to provide informed consent
  • •Women (knowledge and risk perception surveys) We plan to enroll approximately 600 women (50 per health facility) to complete a survey about cervical cancer and HPV knowledge, risk perception and screening awareness, acceptability and self-efficacy.\
  • •Eligibility criteria for women participants include:
  • •Reside within Siaya County, in one of the study communities
  • •Eligible for cervical cancer screening per the Kenya Ministry of Health guidelines and
  • •Ability to provide informed consent.
  • •CHPs in both arms will be asked to complete a survey about their self-efficacy, knowledge of HPV and cervical cancer, and the usability of the mSaada app (CHPs in the intervention arm only).
  • •CHV participants must be employed by government clinics in Siaya County, and
  • •be able to provide informed consent.
  • •Does not understand the study purpose and details
  • •Is not willing to sign an informed consent

Arms & Interventions

Usual care

No Intervention

Counseling will be provided using standard Ministry of Health (MoH) items and screening data and specimen tracking will be done using MoH registers.

mSaada platform

Experimental

Counseling, specimen tracking and case management will be facilitated using mSaada.

Intervention: mSaada (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Proportion of women in each arm who complete cervical cancer screening

Time Frame: 1-day

Calculated by dividing the number of women screened by the number of eligible women attending health facilities

Proportion of women in each arm who test HPV-positive and access treatment within 3 months of receiving their results

Time Frame: 1-day

Calculated the number of women treated within 3 months of receiving their results by dividing the number of women who test HPV positive

Difference in women's knowledge level of cervical cancer as measured by a knowledge scale between the arms

Time Frame: 1-day

The knowledge scale has a score range of 0 to 5, where a higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge.

Difference in women risk perception of cervical cancer as measured by a risk perception scale between the arms

Time Frame: 1-day

The Risk Perception Scale has 3 Likert scale questions regarding risk perception.

Difference in Community Health Promoter (CHP) screening self-efficacy, knowledge, usability between the arms

Time Frame: 1-day

Quantitative self-efficacy, knowledge and usability survey with CHPs after participating in the study..

Number of Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) reporting a usability score greater than 60

Time Frame: 1-day

mSaada Usability Survey with a range of 20-100, where a higher score indicates a higher level of acceptability (mean scores \>60 is considered acceptable).

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Duke University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials