Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury
- Conditions
- Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
- Interventions
- Device: K-wire
- Registration Number
- NCT05844098
- Lead Sponsor
- Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
- Brief Summary
This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes and radioligic outcomes between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.
The main question it aims to answer is:
- Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?
- Detailed Description
Acromioclavicular joint injury (ACJI) is one of the most common injury of shoulder joint. Most common mechanism of injury is from direct force apply to the affected shoulder, in adduction position, in acromion process area. Most of the intervention that have been used for treat ACJI are focused on pain control, maintain the strength of the joint, no limitation in daily life activity and full range of motion of affected shoulder. Operative treatment is indicated in ACJI Rockwood classification grade III, IV, V, and VI. Nowadays there are over 60 surgical techniques without gold standard. Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation is one of the most popular technique that has been used for ACJI.
This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes (ACJI score, VAS, Constant score and DASH score) and radioligic outcomes (CC-distance difference, GACA difference) between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.
The main question it aims to answer is:
- Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Age 18-45 years old
- Acute AC joint injury rockwood classification III, IV and V
- History of underwent previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery
- Specific active associated ipsilateral injury (Rib fractures, clavicel fractures, scapula fractures and base of coracoid fractures)
- Onset of injury more than 3 weeks
- Cannot underwent arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description With K-wire K-wire arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with K-wire
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) score 1 year post-operative Functional outcome, Rated from 0-100, higher score means better function of the shoulder
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gleno-acromio-clavicular angle (GACA) difference 3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop Radiologic outcome
Constant score 3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop Functional outcome, Score from 0-100, Higher score means better shoulder function
VAS 3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop Functional outcome, Scale from 0-10, Lower score means better outcome
Coracoclavicular (CC) distance diference Postoperative day 1, 2weeks postop, 6weeks postop, 3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop Radiologic outcome
DASH score 3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop Functional outcome, Score from 0-100, 0 means no disabillity, 100 means most severe disabillity
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital
🇹ðŸ‡Chon Buri, Thailand