NCT06494098已完成不适用
Conventional Versus Modified Pre-surgical Naso-Alveolar Molding Treatment in Cleft Lip and Palate Infants
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 20
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Attaining columellar length
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinically conventional Pre-surgical Naso-Alveolar Molding (PNAM) treatment versus Modified Naso-Alveolar Molding protocol (MPNAM) in cleft lip and palate patients in terms of:
- Decreasing cleft gap.
- Attaining columellar length.
- Effect on maxillary growth.
- Treatment Duration.
- Parents acceptance.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 2 Weeks 至 2 Months(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •The age range from 14 -30 days after birth.
- •Has complete cleft lip and palate.
- •Parents acceptance.
- •Medically free infants.
排除标准
- •Syndromic patients.
- •Medically compromised patients contradicting operation.
结局指标
主要结局
Attaining columellar length
时间窗: 3 month
the length of columella has increased after nasoalveolar molding orthopedic treatment
次要结局
- Treatment Duration(3 month)
研究者
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
尚未招募
2 期
comparison of two different technique 3D printed and conventional nasoalveolar molding plates in newborns with gap in the lip region and hole in the roof(palate) of the mouthCTRI/2023/06/053938JSS Dental College and Hospital,JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research
尚未招募
4 期
scanning of the face of cleft lip and palate patient before and after treatmentCTRI/2020/03/024316ALISHA K H
Unknown
不适用
Comparison of Two Nasoalveolar Molding Techniques in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip PatientUnilateral Complete Cleft LipNCT01883726Chang Gung Memorial Hospital30
尚未招募
不适用
Assessment of change in nasal airflow before and after septorhinoplastyCTRI/2021/05/033710All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur
已完成
不适用
To study change in size of the hole present in palate ( roof) of the mouth and gap present in jaw and lip using two different technique technique in orofacial cleft patient.CTRI/2019/02/017486Priyanka Bhaje20
