跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/07/091221
CTRI/2025/07/091221尚未招募不适用

Comparison of Bougie guided Insertion of Blockbuster LMA Versus Conventional method in successful placement of LMA – A Randomised Comparative Study

Subbiah Institute of Medical Science1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2025年8月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number of attempts for successful placement of LMA

研究概览

简要总结

Airway management is a key skill in anesthesiology. Till 1980s only face mask and endotracheal tubes were available. The introduction of Laryngeal mask airway revolutionised practise. Blockbuster Laryngeal mask airway features a more angulated airway and gastric port offering improved sealing and ease of intubation.Studies suggest bougie guided insertion improves success rates over digital methods with classical Laryngeal mask airway i.e LMA.Limited research exists on this technique with Blockbuster LMA prompting further investigation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status 1 and 2 Modified mallampatti 1 and 2.

排除标准

  • American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status 3 and 4 Modified mallampatti 3 and 4 Pregnant women Obesity with BMI greater than 30.

结局指标

主要结局

Number of attempts for successful placement of LMA

时间窗: 3 attempts

次要结局

  • 1) Duration for a successful placement of Blockbuster LMA(2) Hemodynamic response to insertion)

研究者

发起方
Subbiah Institute of Medical Science
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Swetha P

Subbiah Institute of Medical Science

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验