COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF 2 INJECTION METHODS WITH ARTICAINE FOR TREATMENT IN MANDIBULAR MOLARS WITH SYMPTOMATIC IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS. A CONSORT RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL : AN IN-VIVO STUDY.

Dr Harsh Jain0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新: 2021年11月24日

试验速览

暂无简介。

•1. Systemically healthy patients.
•2. Patients 18â??65 years old.
•3. Not allergic to articaine or epinephrine.
•4. No facial paresthesia.
•5. Not taking any analgesic drug 6 hours before treatment.
•6. Not taking any medication that interferes with anesthesia, such as tricyclic antidepressants and beta-blockers.
•7. The absence of pathogenesis in areas planned for injection.
•8. Not pregnant.
•9. The absence of pathologic periodontal pockets during probing.
•10. Patients with a mandibular molar tooth exhibiting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
•11. Vital coronal pulp on access opening.
•12. American society of anesthesiologist class 1 medical history.
•13. The ability to understand the use of pain scale.
•14. Patient experiencing greater than moderate pain and spontaneous and prolonged response to cold testing with Endo-Ice will be included in the study.
•15. Teeth showing normal periapical view in the radiograph.

•1. A standard inferior alveolar nerve block injection will be performed using articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000. Ten minutes after the injection, the patients will be asked about lip numbness. Patients without profound lip numbness will be excluded from the study because the block will be considered â??missedâ?? which will also be confirmed with electric pulp sensibility test.
•2. Participants with periapical lesions, abscesses or cellulites at the relevant tooth, those with a medical treatment history or those having undergone root canal treatment for the relevant tooth will also be excluded from the study.

发起方

Dr Harsh Jain