Comparison of ultrasound versus landmark-guided caudal block in neonates and infants: A randomized controlled study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1.1st Attempt success rate
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of our study is compare the first attempt success rate and efficacy of ultrasound versus landmark guided caudal block.80 patients belonging to age group <= 1 year with ASA II or III are randomly selected into two groups.In group US ultrasound guided caudal block given to neonates and infants and in group LB landmark guided caudal block given to neaonates and infants. The primary objective is to compare the first attempt success rate in both group.Block performance time, number of needle puncture,tachycardia on putting incision, duration if post operative analgesia,complication of block are the secondary parameters and also noted in both the groups. The proposed advantage of our study is first attempt success rate is higher in ultrasound guided caudal block.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1.00 Day(s) 至 1.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients undergoing posted for elective or emergency lower abdominal surgery like non-obstructed inguinal hernia, anoplasty, colostomy, circumcision etc.
- •Term neonates and age £ 1 year
- •Patients conformed to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status -II-III in preoperative assessment
- •Ability to follow the study protocol by parents.
排除标准
- •Neonates with upper/midgut obstruction 2) Coagulation abnormalities 3) Sacral anomalies 4) Long-duration surgeries with major fluid shifts 5) Neuromuscular or metabolic disorders 6) Systemic infection 7) Meningitis 8) Local infection at the site of puncture 9) Raised intra-cranial tension.
结局指标
主要结局
1.1st Attempt success rate
时间窗: At basline
次要结局
- 1. Time to perform the block(2. Number of needle punctures required for successful block)
研究者
Dr Jayanam patel
Government medical college,baroda