Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02494531
NCT02494531CompletedNot Applicable

Illiteracy and Vulnerability to Alzheimer's Disease: Evaluation of Amyloid Pathology by PET Imaging

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris1 site in 1 country45 target enrollmentStarted: December 12, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
45
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of the amount of amyloid deposits using florbetapir-18 Fluor-PET between illiterate and literate MCI patients

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to improve the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at two different stages (MCI and dementia) in illiterate subjects, using FDG- fluorodeoxyglucose - and florbetapir F 18 -PET imaging. This study will compare amyloid load and cerebral metabolism dysfunction in literate versus illiterate MCI and AD patients.

Detailed Description

Illiterate, with a higher rate in the elder and in multi-cultural population reaching, then, 20%. Most of these patients are not usually included in research studies.

Thus, AVILL would specifically focus on lower educated and illiterate patients and on use of PET imaging for early diagnosis. This study would take advantage of the collaboration with the recently launched Memento cohort.

RATIONALE:

  1. The diagnosis of AD at the early stages of the disease appears to be crucial. MCI is now considered as the 1st clinical stage of the disease, after a long pre-clinical period.

  2. Cognitive reserve modulates the relationship between cerebral lesions and their clinical manifestations by limiting the negative impact of cerebral lesion on cognition. Education is a commonly-used proxy of cognitive reserve. Education interacts with AD pathology such that a greater pathological burden is required to show an effect on cognition among subjects with more education. Lower education and illiteracy are thus considered as risk factor of developing AD

  3. Diagnosing MCI and AD in lower educated and illiterate patients is a real challenge because of:

  4. -difficulties in cognitive evaluation which mostly relies on educational background and reading abilities,

  5. -poor adaptation of neuropsychological tests,

  6. -lack of clinical and imaging data concerning these patients, who are often excluded from studies, and poor knowledge of the evolution of the disease from the earlier signs (MCI) to dementia.

  7. Quantification of amyloid deposit by PET imaging could therefore be useful for the diagnosis of AD in illiterate patients.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •For all patients enrolled in the study:
  • •Aged 18 years and above
  • •Visual and auditory acuity adequate for neuropsychological testing
  • •Having signed an informed consent
  • •Being affiliated to health insurance
  • •For MCI patients:
  • •For this group, the criteria are the same as those of Memento but with specially designed neuropsychological tests for illiterate/low educated patients.
  • •Performing worse than one standard deviation to the mean (compared to age and educational norms) in one or more cognitive domains (neuropsychological tests battery exploring memory, language, praxis, vision, executive functions); this deviation is required to be documented by tests performed less than 6 months age
  • •Clinical dementia Rating scale < or = 0.5
  • •For AD patients
  • •Fulfilling DSM IV criteria of AD
  • •Clinical Dementia Rating scale > 0.5 Patients are defined as "illiterate" having 5 or less years of schooling, and "literate" when having more than 5 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Being under guardianship
  • •Residence in skilling nursing facility
  • •Pregnant or breast feeding women
  • •Alzheimer's disease caused by gene mutations
  • •Brain MRI exclusion criteria (pacemakers, aneurysm clips, artificial heart valves, ear implants, metal fragments or foreign objects in the eyes, skin, or body) or refusing MRI
  • •Neurological disease such as: treated epilepsy, treated Parkinson's disease, Huntington disease, brain tumour, subdural haematoma, progressive supranuclear palsy, history of head trauma followed by persistent neurological deficits, history of stroke
  • •Schizophrenia or other psychiatric history (DSM-IV criteria)

Arms & Interventions

Positon Emission Tomographic (PET)-scan

Other

2 PET-scan: Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and florbetapir F 18-PET

Intervention: Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (Radiation)

Positon Emission Tomographic (PET)-scan

Other

2 PET-scan: Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and florbetapir F 18-PET

Intervention: florbetapir F 18-PET (Radiation)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of the amount of amyloid deposits using florbetapir-18 Fluor-PET between illiterate and literate MCI patients

Time Frame: Within 2 months after inclusion

Comparison between the 2 groups (educated and non -educated) of florbetapir-18 Fluor Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) ratios (max and mean of SUVr) in MCI patients

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of the amyloid deposit location between the 2 groups (literate and illiterate)(Within 2 months after inclusion)
  • Comparison of the amount of amyloid deposits using florbetapir-18 Fluor-PET between illiterate and literate AD patients,(Within 2 months after inclusion)
  • correlation between amyloid load and metabolism dysfunction using Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET in each groups(Within 2 months after inclusion)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials