跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04420871
NCT04420871已完成1 期

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Two Capecitabine Tablets in Patients With Colorectal or Breast Cancer Under Fed Conditions: a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Three-period, and Reference-replicated Crossover Study

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 48 人开始时间: 2018年12月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
48
试验地点
1
主要终点
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

研究概览

简要总结

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-period, and reference-replicated crossover study was conducted in 48 patients with colorectal or breast cancer under fed conditions to assess the bioequivalence between two formulations of capecitabine.

详细描述

This was a multicenter, open, random, balanced, three-period, three-sequence and semi-repetitive cross study with 48 subjects. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one period of test formulation or two period of reference formulation, followed by a 1-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected at 0 hours (predose) up to 8 hours postdose. The plasma concentrations of capecitabine were analyzed by LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters (non-compartmental model) were assessed with WinNonlin software. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (C max ), time needed to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), the elimination half-life (t1/2), and terminal elimination rate (λz). All were analyzed using an ANOVA model after logarithmic transformation of the data. For establishing bioequivalence (BE) for capecitabine, reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) acceptance criteria and average bioequivalence (ABE) acceptance criteria were used. Safety and tolerability was assessed during the entire study period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
28 Years 至 69 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal or breast cancer receiving capecitabine monotherapy or combination chemotherapy.
  • Eligible patients were within 18-70 years of age.
  • ECOG score was 0-
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 50%.
  • There was no serious persistent toxicity to capecitabine treatment before screening (laboratory tests ≤ grade 1 (NCI CTCAE 5.0 standard)
  • Hand-foot syndrome ≤ grade 2 after recovery from the previous treatment period).

排除标准

  • Patients were known allergy to fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil.
  • Patients with complete lack of known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity.
  • Patients with abnormal hepatic and renal function (serum creatinine≤ 1.5 ×ULN; CLcr ≥ 51 mL/min; bilirubin≤ 1.5 ×ULN; AST, ALT≤2.5×ULN)
  • Needed to accept phenytoin, warfarin, other coumarin derivatives anticoagulants, folic acid, and CYP2C9 substrates during the research.
  • Patients with brain metastases or other metastases of the central nervous system (except those who were treated at least 6 months prior to the start of the study and were stable and asymptomatic).

研究组 & 干预措施

capecitabine reference formulation at a single dose of 150 mg

Active Comparator

150 mg of Xeloda® produced by Genentech USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the company, was used as the reference intervention in this study.

干预措施: 150 mg of Xeloda® (Drug)

capecitabine test formulation at a single dose of 150 mg

Experimental

The tablet of 150 mg of capecitabine from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (17H0053DE4, Jinan, Shandong Province, China) was used as the test formulation.

干预措施: 150 mg of capecitabine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

时间窗: 18 days

Evaluation of Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-t

时间窗: 18 days

Evaluation of Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-t

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-∞

时间窗: 18 days

Evaluation of Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-∞

次要结局

  • Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events(18 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验