ACTRN12614000143628已完成未知
A comparison of two non-thrust mobilization techniques applied to the C7 segment in patients with restricted and painful cervical rotation: A Quasi-randomized controlled trial
Doug Creighton0 个研究点目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2014年2月5日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non-randomised trial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Open (masking not used)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 100 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients with limited neck rotation (movement to the left and right) and pain experienced at the end of this movement
排除标准
- •Cervical instability and or symptomatic disc herniation at the C7 motion segments
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Effectiveness of 2 Different Mobilization Technique in Cervicogenic Headache- A Randomized Controlled TrialCTRI/2023/07/054745Divya Singh
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparison the effectiveness of mobilization and mobilization with movement on range of motion and acromiohumeral distance in patients with chronic shoulder impingement syndromeIRCT20230722058881N1Zahedan University of Medical Sciences30
已完成
不适用
Mobilization Versus Manipulation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic HeadachesCervicogenic HeadacheNCT03919630Franklin Pierce University48
已完成
不适用
Cervical radiculopathy: A new traction method versus ventroflexion traction :A randomized controlled 1-year follow-up studyCervical radiculopathyPhysical Medicine / Rehabilitation - PhysiotherapyACTRN12613000169741Ibrahim Moustafa Moustafa216
已完成
不适用
comparison of effect thrust and non thrust mobilization of thoracic spine in patients with mechanical neck paiCTRI/2019/01/016930no sponsor75