Comparison of a Patient Warming System Using a Forced-air, Non-compressible Under-body Mattress Versus a Regular Forced-air Underbody Mattress System During Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
- Conditions
- Hypothermia
- Interventions
- Device: Forced air warming compressibleDevice: Forced air non-compressible
- Registration Number
- NCT02342431
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Brief Summary
The study is a comparison of a patient warming system using a forced-air, non-compressible under-body mattress (Möck \& Möck, Hamburg, Germany) versus a regular forced-air underbody mattress system during pediatric cardiac catheterization in 40 patients.
The hypothesis is, that the non-compressible mattress provides better warming with less incidence of perioperative hypothermia (Core temperature \< 36 °C) and faster warming slope (°C / time). The study is prospective, randomized, controlled and single-blinded.
Inclusion criteria will be pediatric patients \< 1 year of age without fever or a treatment of therapeutic hypothermia.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- Pediatric patient scheduled for cardiac catheterization (diagnostic and/or interventional)< 1 year old
- fever or therapeutic hypothermia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Forced air compressible warming Forced air warming compressible Warming with a compressible forced air mattress Forced air non-compressible Forced air non-compressible Warming with a non-compressible forced air mattress
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of hypothermia during surgery (1 - 6 hours)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Core Temperature Slope during surgery (1 - 6 hours)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medical University of Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria