MedPath

Comparison of a Patient Warming System Using a Forced-air, Non-compressible Under-body Mattress Versus a Regular Forced-air Underbody Mattress System During Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization

Phase 4
Withdrawn
Conditions
Hypothermia
Interventions
Device: Forced air warming compressible
Device: Forced air non-compressible
Registration Number
NCT02342431
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

The study is a comparison of a patient warming system using a forced-air, non-compressible under-body mattress (Möck \& Möck, Hamburg, Germany) versus a regular forced-air underbody mattress system during pediatric cardiac catheterization in 40 patients.

The hypothesis is, that the non-compressible mattress provides better warming with less incidence of perioperative hypothermia (Core temperature \< 36 °C) and faster warming slope (°C / time). The study is prospective, randomized, controlled and single-blinded.

Inclusion criteria will be pediatric patients \< 1 year of age without fever or a treatment of therapeutic hypothermia.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • Pediatric patient scheduled for cardiac catheterization (diagnostic and/or interventional)< 1 year old
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • fever or therapeutic hypothermia
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Forced air compressible warmingForced air warming compressibleWarming with a compressible forced air mattress
Forced air non-compressibleForced air non-compressibleWarming with a non-compressible forced air mattress
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of hypothermiaduring surgery (1 - 6 hours)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Core Temperature Slopeduring surgery (1 - 6 hours)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical University of Vienna

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath