Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03529214
NCT03529214
Completed
N/A

A Program Evaluation to Measure the Feasibility of the Team Birth Project

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)4 sites in 1 country5,217 target enrollmentMay 29, 2018

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pregnancy Complications
Sponsor
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Enrollment
5217
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Percent of Clinicians Recommending TeamBirth Project
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a pilot project to improve communication and teamwork and to increase vaginal delivery rates at hospital in the United States

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a pilot project to improve communication and teamwork and to increase vaginal delivery rates at hospital in the United States. TeamBirth is a rigorously designed care process to improve care and SDM across the full care team, which includes the patient, their support person(s), nurse and physician or midwife, by ensuring reliability for best practices in communication and teamwork during labor and delivery. TeamBirth aims to operationalize best practices in communication and clinical care from the major professional organizations in obstetrics, including the American College of Obstetricians \& Gynecologists (ACOG), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM), and Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN), to ensure these practices are occurring consistently throughout labor. Key TeamBirth practices include: 1. Promoting the roles of the laboring patient, nurse, and delivering provider as members of the care team with equally valuable input for SDM, 2. Eliciting the patient's preferences, symptoms, and subjective experiences and integrating them with clinical data to inform patient care plans, 3. Distinguishing statuses and care plans for the mother, fetus, and labor progress, and 4. Setting shared expectations for the next planned evaluation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 29, 2018
End Date
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
11 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Neel Shah

Principal Investigator

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All clinicians who have practice privileges at a study site
  • Clinician Participant

Exclusion Criteria

  • Implementation Team Participant Inclusion Criteria:
  • Champions, super-users and others who have been involved in the implementation of "Team Birth Project" at a study site
  • Implementation Team Participant Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient Participant Inclusion Criteria:
  • 18 years or older
  • Live birth. Includes: spontaneous or induction of labor; Vaginally, with an instruments (forceps / vacuum), or unscheduled cesarean delivery
  • Patient at a study site piloting "Team Birth Project"
  • Patient Participant Exclusion Criteria:
  • Under 18 years old
  • Scheduled cesarean delivery

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percent of Clinicians Recommending TeamBirth Project

Time Frame: The window begins on the 180th day to the 270th day from the start date at each site (180 days to 270 days). If clinicians complete more than one survey in the window, we will use the first one.

At the project midline, percent of clinicians (physicians, midwives, and nurses) who would definitely or probably recommend the Team Birth project tools for use in other labor and delivery units.

Percent of Patients With the Role They Wanted in Decision-Making

Time Frame: The window begins on the 180th day to the 270th day from the start date at each site (180 days to 270 days). Patients were only offered the survey once within the window.

At the project midline, percent of patients who definitely or somewhat had the role they wanted in making decisions about their labor, among patients who wanted to make collaborative decisions with clinicians.

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials