Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06948695
NCT06948695RecruitingNot Applicable

Evaluation of the Biomechanics of Crowding and the Energetic Cost of Endurance Runners Unilateral Transtibial Amputees According to the Stiffness of the Race-specific Prothesis.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne1 site in 1 country24 target enrollmentStarted: April 23, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
24
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Oxygen consumption measurement

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Transtibial amputation accounts for 3,700 cases per year in France. Athletes can use sport blades made of carbon plate for improved energy restitution.

Sports blades are adjusted according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the subjective experience of the ortho-prosthetist and patient. These adjustments are designed to optimize performance and comfort while reducing the risk of injury. This risk is all the greater when asymmetries between the healthy and affected limbs are large, exposing the healthy limb to large and repeated reaction forces.

Detailed Description

Furthermore, one of the performance criteria for long-distance running is energy cost. While a reduction in this parameter has been observed in bilateral amputees, heterogeneous data are reported in unilateral amputees, depending on the level of expertise and sports blade settings.

While studies have investigated the effects of running with a prosthesis under conditions representative of track running, few data are available on sports blades designed for long-distance running.

It therefore seems important to be able to objectively assess the effects of a change in the stiffness of the sports blade on the energetics and biomechanics of running, in order to optimize practice and prevent associated traumas.

Secondly, investigators believe it is important to verify that the biomechanical results obtained in the laboratory are applicable in the field, both on the road and on the unstable terrain encountered by trail runners.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Male or female,
  • •Weighing less than 110 kg, in accordance with C-blade recommendations,
  • •Subjects who have undergone a unilateral transtibial amputation,
  • •Have been running with a sports blade for at least 3 months, over several sessions of at least 3 kilometers.
  • •Subjects who have signed a written consent form,
  • •Subjects affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Subjects whose amputation is due to complications related to diabetes or atherosclerosis.
  • •Subjects with chronic or central neurological pathologies
  • •Subjects with cardiovascular disorders
  • •Subjects with alcohol or drug dependency.
  • •Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • •Subjects under court protection.

Arms & Interventions

Usual blade stiffness

Active Comparator

Data collection on a blade with usual stiffness during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Warm-up (Other)

Usual blade stiffness

Active Comparator

Data collection on a blade with usual stiffness during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Random blade test (Other)

Usual blade stiffness

Active Comparator

Data collection on a blade with usual stiffness during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Comfort speed test (Other)

Usual blade stiffness

Active Comparator

Data collection on a blade with usual stiffness during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Outdoor random blade test (Other)

Less stiff blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a less stiff blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Warm-up (Other)

Less stiff blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a less stiff blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Random blade test (Other)

Less stiff blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a less stiff blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Comfort speed test (Other)

Less stiff blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a less stiff blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Outdoor random blade test (Other)

Stiffer blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a stiffer blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Warm-up (Other)

Stiffer blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a stiffer blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Random blade test (Other)

Stiffer blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a stiffer blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Comfort speed test (Other)

Stiffer blade

Active Comparator

Data collection on a stiffer blade during a run at comfort speed according to slope (flat, uphill +10% and downhill -10% on treadmill) and type of terrain (road, path).

Intervention: Outdoor random blade test (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Oxygen consumption measurement

Time Frame: Day 1

4-minute flat run on a treadmill at comfort speed

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cadence of running (in steps per minutes)(Day 1)
  • Stride length (in meters) of running(Day 1)
  • Oxygen consumption measurement(Day 1)
  • Cadence (in steps per minute) of running(Day 2)
  • Kinematic analysis(Day 1)
  • Stride length (in metres) of running(Day 2)
  • Leg muscle activity (mV)(Day 1, 2)
  • Subjective sensation recording(Day 1, 2)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Evaluation of the Biomechanics of Crowding... | Clinical Trial