Routine Referrals to Third Sector Organisations Following Reablement to Target Loneliness Among Older Adults Aged 65years and Over.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Risk of loneliness of participants as identified with the De Jon Gierveld (DJG)loneliness scale.
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this feasibility study is to find out if routine referrals of older adults aged 65years and over to community activities provided by third sector organisations will reduce their loneliness risk.
Researcher will compare referrals of older adults to community activities following reablement provided by intermediate care to attendance of online activities to find out which will be effective in reducing loneliness risk of older adults aged 65years and over. Researcher will also find out if it will be feasible to complete a full randomised controlled trial.
详细描述
Introduction The older adult population is increasing in England and Wales. In 2001, there were 8.3million aged 65years and over compared to 11million in 2021. This has resulted in their increased hospital admissions with subsequent use of reablement following discharge. Older adults will be used to represent those aged 65years and over for this study.
Reablement aims at increasing independence of older adults and is being used to reduce their care cost. However, there is an apparent contradiction in that many older adults are often socially isolated following an episode of reablement. Loneliness has also been reported among older adults and this has the potential of impacting on their psychological and physical wellbeing.
This research will investigate the impact of routinely referring older adult reablement recipients to services in the community (neither public nor private sector) known as third sector organisations (National Audit Office) that target loneliness to reduce their recurrent admissions to hospitals. It will be carried out in an Intermediate Care Team providing reablement in the East Midlands of England. Background Reablement is a short-term (up to six weeks) programme aimed at relearning skills that are lost through ill health. Locally, Intermediate Care Team (ICT) of the National Health Service (NHS) facilitates and prevents admissions from hospitals by providing reablement at the home of patients in the County being studied. ICT is however, commissioned to discharge patients within 17 days of admission to its caseload. It is not clear whether reablement programmes are set to address longer-term issues of recipients during and after the service. Support systems after the service of those who emerge independent are also not clear. These were noted from a service evaluation carried out by the researcher and other researchers have also note the paradoxical increase in hospital admissions following reablement of older adults. These could be related to the psychological and physical factors affecting recipients who emerge independent and end up living alone with no services involved. Literature Review There is a plethora of literature on the positive impacts of reablement on the physical abilities of older adults. Older adult recipients find it beneficial, and report increase independence of their activities of daily living . Some recipients have also been reported to have reduced home care leading to reduction in financial cost of care. Positive mental wellbeing and social functioning of some recipients have been reported.
There is, however, a paucity of literature on the impact of loneliness on older adults who receive reablement, particularly those who are discharged as independent but have no family support. As reablement promotes independent living, there could be a possibility of some recipients being at risk of loneliness and isolation. efficient ways of maintaining the quality of life of older adults is needed amidst the increase in the older adult population and budget cuts of local governments. In studies to find out the effectiveness of interventions to reduce loneliness among older adults, their active participation in group activities has been found to limit their loneliness. Other studies however, did not find group interventions more effective compared to one- to- one interventions in tackling older adults' loneliness. Some studies also did not find social intervention effective in reducing loneliness. Video conferencing has been found effective in directly and indirectly reducing loneliness among older adults but has its own limitations of health inequalities.
Social prescribing helps patients access nonclinical support . This is however mainly available through some General Practitioner (GP) services. The older adult patients described in this study might likely not be accessing such support. The Innovation Potential This study will ascertain third sector organisations currently available in the community for older adults deemed as independent after receiving reablement with stakeholders. It will explore whether these services are sufficient or appropriate to meet the needs of older adults who are socially isolated and at risk of loneliness. Older adults will be involved in the development of the project to identify solutions. This will add to the evidence base for longer-term impact beyond the initial reablement episode. Aim To find out whether routine referrals to third sector organisations of older adults who have been discharged as independent from ICT will be effective in reducing their loneliness risk and recurrent hospital admissions. Objectives Objective 1: To complete a literature review on older adults' loneliness and reablement. Objective 2: To identify third sector organisations available in the local area for socially isolated older adults. Objective 3: To co design questions for semi structured interviews of older adult ICT patients to be referred to the identified third sector organisations following reablement with an older adult Patient and Public Interest (PPI) group.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Past and current patients of the team aged 65years and over retrieved from 12months up to the month of recruitment (August 2023 to September 2024).
- •Patients who have had at least three hospital admissions and three admissions to the team.
- •Patients whose admissions resulted or will result in being discharged with no further action.
- •Patients identified as at loneliness risk by a score of 3 or more on the De Jon Loneliness Scale.
排除标准
- •Patients of the team who will be discharged with planned care package or family support.
- •Patients of the team who lack mental capacity.
结局指标
主要结局
Risk of loneliness of participants as identified with the De Jon Gierveld (DJG)loneliness scale.
时间窗: Enrollment where the initial measures will be taken and then at six months from when the initial measures were taken which will be the end of the study.
Quantitative measure of loneliness risk from 0 (no risk) to 11(highest risk) with the DJG scale with a score of at least 3 representing being at risk of loneliness for the current study.
Frailty of participants as measured by the Frailty Index Scale.
时间窗: Initial Frailty Index scale will be measured when participants are randomised to intervention groups and the final Frailty Index Scale will be measured six months from being assigned to intervention group.
The Frailty Index Scale quantifies function between 1 and 9 with one being the least frail and 9 being very frail. This will help establish whether the intervention improves function in participants.
Self reported physical activity levels and mental wellbeing of participants as identified by EQ-5D-5L scale.
时间窗: EQ-5D-5L will initially be collected when participants are randomised to intervention groups and again at six months from when they were randomised to intervention groups.
The EQ-5D-5L scale is a self reported outcome measure which allows participants to assess their own physical function, mental wellbeing and health. This will help establish whether the interventions improve the reported physical function, mental wellbeing and health of participants or not.
次要结局
- Feasibility Outcomes(Six months from enrolment where the outcome measures will be initially collected.)
- Suitability of randomising participants as measured by the percentage of participants who will be able to attend their assigned interventions for the six month duration(The feasibility of randomising participants will be determined at six months from when participants were randomised to intervention groups.)
- Feasibility of delivering the interventions within the time stipulated as identified by the percentage of participants completing their assigned interventions at six months from initial randomisation of participants.(The feasibility of delivering the interventions within the time stipulated will be determined at six months from the time of initial randomisation of participants to intervention groups.)
