MedPath

LCZ696 in Advanced LV Hypertrophy and HFpEF

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Heart Failure
Essential Hypertension
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03928158
Lead Sponsor
National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Brief Summary

Patients with advanced LVH and HFpEF will be randomly assigned in open-label fashion to receive LCZ696 titrated to 200 mg twice daily or valsartan titrated to 160 mg twice daily, and will be treated for 24 weeks.

Detailed Description

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has a significant morbidity and mortality, and therapies that have proven effective in HF with reduced EF have not been shown to improve long-term prognosis in HFpEF. Inhibition of circulating neprilysin could augment deficient NP-receptor GC signaling and therefore be beneficial in HFpEF, as suggested by the decrease in NP following administration of valsartan/sacubitril in the phase 2 (PARAMOUNT study). Use of valsartan/sacubitril is currently being tested in the multicenter PARAGON-HF trial with HFpEF patients. The investigators suppose the best candidates for LCZ696 therapy will be patients with HFpEF and advanced concentric LV hypertrophy and obesity, i.e. having the lowest BNP bioavailability.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
61
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Moderate/severe hypertensive left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVMi ≥109 g/m² in women and ≥132 g/m² in men);
  2. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III heart failure;
  3. Left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%;
  4. Increased LV filling pressures assessed at rest or at peak exercise by echocardiography
  5. Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m²
  6. Signed and data informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Age ≤ 18 years;
  2. Evidence of myocardial ischemia during stress echocardiography;
  3. Chronic atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation;
  4. Alternative cause of left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired diastolic function (hypertrophic/restictive cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis, constrictive pericarditis and etc.);
  5. NYHA classification I or decompensated heart failure at screening;
  6. Systolic blood pressure < 110 mmHg or > 180 mmHg;
  7. Diastolic blood pressure < 40 mmHg or > 100 mmHg;
  8. Anemia (Hb < 100 g/l);
  9. Significant left sided structural valve disease;
  10. Secondary hypertension;
  11. Dyspnea due to non-cardiac causes such as pulmonary disease, anemia, severe obesity, primary valvular, or myocardial diseases;
  12. Myocardial infarction or myocardial revascularization within the last 3 months of screening;
  13. Stroke or TIA within the last 3 months of screening;
  14. Autoimmunic and oncological diseases;
  15. Impaired renal function, defined as eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m²;
  16. Impaired liver function;
  17. Potassium concentration >5.2 mmol/L.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LCZ 696LCZ 696Initial dose - 50 mg twice daily, up-titration to 200 mg twice daily. Patients will also receive standard therapy for heart failure (β-blockers, diuretics, MRAs)
ValsatranValsartanInitial dose - 40 mg twice daily, up-titration to 160 mg twice daily. Patients also will receive standard therapy for heart failure (β-blockers, diuretics, MRAs)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD)24 weeks

Difference in distance walked during 6-minute walking test (6MWT) between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in monocyte chemoattractant-1 (MCP-1)24 weeks

DIfference in MCP-1 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification24 weeks

Difference in NYHA class between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in exercise time during diastolic stress-test (DST)24 weeks

Difference in exercise time during DST between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)24 weeks

Difference in PASP assessed by echocardiography at peak exercise both at rest and at peak exercise during diastolic stress test (DST) between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in left atrial volume index (LAVI)24 weeks

Difference in LAVI assessed by echocardiography between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in average E/e' ratio24 weeks

Difference in E/e' ratio assessed by echocardiography both at rest and at peak exercise during diastolic stress test (DST) between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI)24 weeks

Difference in LVMI assessed by echocardiography between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)24 weeks

Difference in NT-proBNP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)24 weeks

Difference in hsCRP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in carboxyterminal propeptide of type I collagen (PICP)24 weeks

DIfference in PICP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score24 weeks

Difference in MLHFQ score between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline. The questionnaire is comprised of 21 important physical, emotional and socioeconomic ways heart failure can adversely affect a patient's life. After receiving brief standardized instructions, the patient marks a 0 (zero) to 5 scale to indicate how much each itemized adverse of heart failure has prevented the patient from living as he or she wanted to live during the past 4 weeks. The questionnaire is simply scored by summation of all 21 responses. Score ranges from 0 (best quality of life) to 105 (worst quality of life).

Change in carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CITP)24 weeks

Difference in CITP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in N-Propeptide Of Type III Procollagen (PIIINP)24 weeks

Difference in PIIINP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in Growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15)24 weeks

Difference in GDF-15 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in sST224 weeks

Difference in sST2 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Change in Galectin-324 weeks

Difference in Galectin-3 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Medical Research Center for Cardiology

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath