A Comparison Between Biological (Veritas®) vs Non Biological Mesh (TIGR®) in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Interventions
- Device: Veritas®Device: TIGR®
- Registration Number
- NCT02985073
- Lead Sponsor
- Vastra Gotaland Region
- Brief Summary
This study compares the outcome using a biological mesh (Veritas®) compared to a non biological mesh (TIGR®) in immediate breast reconstruction.
- Detailed Description
The scientific evidence using different types of mesh in breast reconstruction is low at present with very few randomized controlled studies.
This study aims to compare a biological mesh (Veritas®) compared to a non biological mesh (TIGR®) in patients with hereditary increased risk of developing breast cancer operated with bilateral immediate breast reconstruction regarding implant loss rate,infections,total complication rate,aesthetic outcome, HQOL (health related quality of Life) and economics.
The patients will be enrolled to the study and sign an informed consent. At the operating theater the patient is randomized either to be reconstructed with Veritas® in one breast and TIGR® in the other breast..
The patients will be followed up according to a specified schedule until one year postoperatively as above.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Patients with a confirmed breast cancer gene mutation or a calculated increased risk > 20% of developing a breast cancer during her lifetime.
- All patients that don't fulfill criteria above
- Previous breast surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Veritas® mesh Veritas® Use of Veritas mesh in conjunction with immediate breast reconstruction on one side TIGR® mesh TIGR® Use of TIGR® mesh in conjunction with immediate breast reconstruction on one side
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total complication rate 12 months Total complication rate within one year from surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total infection rate 30 days Total infection rate within 30 days from surgery
Aesthetic outcome 12 months Aesthetic outcome at one year followup will be assessed by analysis of 3-dimensional pre- and post-op pictures in combination with a panel evaluating different aesthetical units of the breast
Total implant loss rate 12 months Total implant loss rate within one year from surgery
HQOL 12 months Three validated questionaries will be used to assess HQOL: EQ-5D,HAD30 and BreastQ. The patient fills in these preoperatively and one year postop
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dept . of plastic surgery
🇸🇪Goteborg, Västra Götaland, Sweden