MedPath

A Comparison Between Biological (Veritas®) vs Non Biological Mesh (TIGR®) in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Device: Veritas®
Device: TIGR®
Registration Number
NCT02985073
Lead Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Brief Summary

This study compares the outcome using a biological mesh (Veritas®) compared to a non biological mesh (TIGR®) in immediate breast reconstruction.

Detailed Description

The scientific evidence using different types of mesh in breast reconstruction is low at present with very few randomized controlled studies.

This study aims to compare a biological mesh (Veritas®) compared to a non biological mesh (TIGR®) in patients with hereditary increased risk of developing breast cancer operated with bilateral immediate breast reconstruction regarding implant loss rate,infections,total complication rate,aesthetic outcome, HQOL (health related quality of Life) and economics.

The patients will be enrolled to the study and sign an informed consent. At the operating theater the patient is randomized either to be reconstructed with Veritas® in one breast and TIGR® in the other breast..

The patients will be followed up according to a specified schedule until one year postoperatively as above.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with a confirmed breast cancer gene mutation or a calculated increased risk > 20% of developing a breast cancer during her lifetime.
Exclusion Criteria
  • All patients that don't fulfill criteria above
  • Previous breast surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Veritas® meshVeritas®Use of Veritas mesh in conjunction with immediate breast reconstruction on one side
TIGR® meshTIGR®Use of TIGR® mesh in conjunction with immediate breast reconstruction on one side
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total complication rate12 months

Total complication rate within one year from surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total infection rate30 days

Total infection rate within 30 days from surgery

Aesthetic outcome12 months

Aesthetic outcome at one year followup will be assessed by analysis of 3-dimensional pre- and post-op pictures in combination with a panel evaluating different aesthetical units of the breast

Total implant loss rate12 months

Total implant loss rate within one year from surgery

HQOL12 months

Three validated questionaries will be used to assess HQOL: EQ-5D,HAD30 and BreastQ. The patient fills in these preoperatively and one year postop

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dept . of plastic surgery

🇸🇪

Goteborg, Västra Götaland, Sweden

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath