Hybrid Closed-Loop for Perioperative Glycemic Control in T2DM With Parenteral Nutrition
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Registration Number
- NCT07121504
- Lead Sponsor
- Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
- Brief Summary
Glycemic control in surgical patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving parenteral nutrition represents a major clinical challenge. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the comparative effectiveness and safety of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pumps combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in perioperative T2DM patients requiring short-term parenteral nutrition.
- Detailed Description
This study is a single-center, open-label, 1:1 randomized controlled exploratory trial. Participants were randomly allocated via complete randomization into two groups: the experimental group (hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system) and the control group (using identical hardware devices, with the experimental group operating in closed-loop mode while the control group in open-loop mode). The intervention duration ranged from 5 to 7 days, adjusted based on glycemic control status, aiming to compare the efficacy and clinical benefits of hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery versus insulin pumps combined with CGM for glycemic management.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
-
Age ≥18 years.
-
Diagnosis of T2DM requiring surgical procedures (duration ≥2 hours) with anticipated short-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) during the perioperative period (expected hospitalization >72 hours).
-
Glycemic control criteria (meeting any of the following):
①HbA1c ≥7.5% or random plasma glucose ≥13.9 mmol/L
- Established T2DM with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5%) despite combination therapy (≥2 oral antidiabetic drugs) ③Insulin-treated patients with suboptimal control (HbA1c ≥7.0%) after adequate dose adjustment.
-
Willing to sign the informed consent form.
-
Patients with acute diabetic complications, including: diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS), etc.
-
Patients with type 1 diabetes or other specific types of diabetes.
-
Patients with severe organ dysfunction, defined as:
-
Cardiac function ≥Class III (NYHA classification)
-
ALT/AST >3× upper limit of normal (ULN) ③ eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m²
- Hemoglobin <90 g/L ⑤ WBC count <4.0×10⁹/L or platelets <90×10⁹/L ⑥ Hemodynamic instability
-
-
-
Patients with endocrine disorders affecting glucose metabolism, such as: hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome, etc.
-
Patients with known hypersensitivity to any drugs or materials used in the study protocol.
-
Patients who have contraindications to conventional insulin pump therapy.
-
Patients with dermatological conditions (e.g., skin rash, prurigo) or coagulation disorders.
-
Patients with impaired consciousness or psychiatric disorders affecting decision-making capacity or communication ability.
-
Patients who have other conditions deemed unsuitable for trial participation by investigators.
-
Patients who suffer severe surgical complications.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method CGM-measured Time in Range (TIR 5.6-10.0 mmol/L) Up to 28 days The difference in percentage of time spent within target glucose range (5.6-10.0 mmol/L) between groups, as continuously monitored by a CGM device, to evaluate the effectiveness of hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery versus control in improving glycemic control for perioperative T2DM patients receiving parenteral nutrition.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time below range (TBR) < 3.9 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured percentage of time with sensor glucose values \<3.9 mmol/L between groups
Time below range (TBR) < 3.0 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured percentage of time with sensor glucose values \<3.0 mmol/L between groups
CGM-measured Mean Glucose Level Up to 28 days CGM-measured mean glucose level between groups
Time above range (TAR) >10.0 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured percentage of time with sensor glucose values \> 10.0 mmol/L between group
Time above range (TAR) >20.0 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured percentage of time with sensor glucose values \> 20.0 mmol/L between group
Time below range (TBR) <5.6 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured percentage of time with sensor glucose values \<5.6 mmol/L between groups
Time below range (TBR) < 2.8 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured percentage of time with sensor glucose values \<2.8 mmol/L between groups
CGM-measured Glucose Standard Deviation (SD) Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured glucose standard deviation between groups. Standard Deviation represents how much glucose levels fluctuate over time from a given average.
CGM-Measured Glucose Coefficient of Variation (CV) Up to 28 days The difference in the CGM-measured glucose coefficient of variation (CV) between groups. The CV is calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean glucose values for each participant, derived from CGM data.
CGM-Measured Glucose Risk Index (GRI) Up to 28 days The CGM-measured glucose risk index (GRI) between groups. GRI is a comprehensive metric derived from CGM data, designed to quantify the overall risk associated with blood glucose variability. It integrates multiple aspects of glucose levels, including the frequency and severity of both hypo- and hyperglycemic events, as well as the duration of time spent outside the target glucose range.
Insulin dose Up to 28 days The difference in the insulin dose between groups
Preoperative optimization duration (days) Up to 28 days The difference in the preoperative optimization duration between groups
Time in range (TIR) 4.4-10.0 mmol/L Up to 28 days The difference in percentage of time spent within target glucose range (4.4-10.0 mmol/L) between groups, as continuously monitored by a CGM device, to evaluate the effectiveness of hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery versus control in improving glycemic control for perioperative T2DM patients receiving parenteral nutrition.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Second Xiangya Hospital of Centra South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011
🇨🇳Changsha, Hunan, China
Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Second Xiangya Hospital of Centra South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011🇨🇳Changsha, Hunan, ChinaXia LiContact+86 13974885753lixia2014@vip.163.com