跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02924805
NCT02924805已完成不适用

Telemedical Versus Conventional Emergency Care of Hypertensive Emergencies and Urgencies

RWTH Aachen University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 331 人开始时间: 2013年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
331
试验地点
1
主要终点
Blood pressure difference between initial contact and emergency room handover

研究概览

简要总结

Comparison of telemedical prehospital emergency care and conventional on-scene physician based care of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies. The adherence to current Guidelines should be researched.

详细描述

Telemedically guided cases of hypertensive emergencies (april 2014 - March 2015) and urgencies are compared with a historical control group of conventional emergency medical service physician care on-scene for these scenarios. The historical control group is a time period prior to implementation of the telemedicine system and after a research project with a precursor telemedicine system. No telemedical support but only conventional on-scene EMS physician care was available (November 2013 - March 2014).

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • prehospital diagnosis of hypertensive emergency of hypertensive urgency

排除标准

  • Prehospital diagnoses of:
  • pulmonary edema
  • aortic dissection
  • acute coronary syndrome
  • acute stroke
  • acute respiratory insufficiency

结局指标

主要结局

Blood pressure difference between initial contact and emergency room handover

时间窗: 2 hours

次要结局

  • Difference of heart rate between initial contact and emergency room handover(2 hours)
  • Magnitude of blood pressure reduction using categories(2 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Telemedical Versus Conventional Emergency Care of... | 临床试验