MedPath

Efficacy and Compliance of the Mandibular Advancement Devices ONIRIS® vs. Custom Made Devices

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Interventions
Device: TALI
Device: ONIRIS®
Registration Number
NCT02348970
Lead Sponsor
ONIRIS
Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy (non-inferiority) in terms of response between patients using custom fitted mandibular advancement devices ONIRIS® and patient using laboratory custom made devices TALI, after 2 months of use. Sleeping tests were performed.

Detailed Description

Open, non-inferiority, controlled and rndomised clinical trial. Six months of inclusion. Each included patient will be followed during 12 months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
211
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with severe syndrome of obstructive sleep apnea and hypopneas refusing or withdrawal from continuous positive pression ventilation
  • no dental, paro-dental or articular contraindication
  • patients never treated by mandibular advancement devices
Exclusion Criteria
  • severe psychiatric or neuromuscular disorders appreciated by the investigator
  • more than 20% of apneas and central hypoapneas
  • severe syndrome of obstructive sleep apnea and hypopneas with IAH > 30% associated with another sleeping pathology
  • BMI > 30kg/m2
  • patient with an uncontrollable nausea reflex
  • epileptic patients
  • pregnant patients
  • patient without written informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
laboratory devices TALITALIThe patients will use the laboratory devices TALI
mandibular advancement devices ONIRIS®ONIRIS®The patients will use the mandibular advancement devices ONIRIS®
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To evaluate the efficacity (non-inferiority) in terms of response between patients using mandibular advancement devices ONIRIS® and patient using devices produced in a laboratoryTALI after 2 months of use.2 monthes of use

The response to the treatment is defined as:

* complete patient response: AHI per hour of sleep \< 10 or

* partial patient response: AHI per hour of sleep reduced by 50% at visit M2 compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evolution of toleranceat M2, M6 and M12

Nature, frequency and intensity of AE at each visit

Evolution of the quality of lifeat baseline, M2, M6 and M12

Quality of life evaluated by SF12 at each visit

AE and SAE occuring during the studyat M2, M6 and M12

Description and comparison at each group of AE and SAE

Evolution of AHI, AI and HIat M2 and at M12

AHI per hour of sleep with the same modalities as the one used for diagnosis (realised by ambulatory PG or PSG)

Percentage of patients responderat M2 and M12

Percentage of patients responder at the last control exam

Evolution during the study of the principal criteria concerning the sleepat baseline, M2, M6 and M12

Snoring measured by VAS, Epworth Sleepness Scale measuring daytime sleepness, Pichot Questionnaire measuring fatigue and depression

Evolution of the complianceat M2, M6 and M12

Percantage of compliance (excellent \> 85%, good \> 50%)

Evolution of arterial hypertensionat baseline, M2, M6 and M12

Arterial hypertension evaluated at each visit

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

CHU de Grenoble

🇫🇷

La Tronche, France

Clinique Bel-Air

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Polyclinique Saint Privat

🇫🇷

Boujan sur Libron, France

Hôpital André Mignot

🇫🇷

Le Chesnay, France

CHU Montpellier

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

Medical Practice

🇫🇷

Perpignan, France

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

🇫🇷

St Denis, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath