Prosthetic Femoral Access for Haemodialysis

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Vascular Access Complication
• Interventions: Procedure: Tunneled Femoral Catheter (TFC) group; Procedure: Femoro-femoral Arteriovenous graft (FF-AVG) group

• Registration Number: NCT04746742
• Lead Sponsor: Mansoura University

Brief Summary

This study will compare the outcomes of tunneled femoral catheter and femoro-femoral arteriovenous graft as a bailout procedure for hemodialysis in chronic kidney disease patients with exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses regarding survival rate, complications, and quality of life

Detailed Description

Aim of the Work:

The aim of this work is to compare the outcomes of tunneled femoral catheter (TFC) and femoro-femoral AVG as regards survival, complication and quality of life as bailout procedure for hemodialysis in CRF patient with exhausted upper limb extremity and chest wall vascular accesses.

Patients and Methods:

Study Design and setting:

This is a single-centre prospective randomized controlled trial that will be conducted in The Vascular Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospital, during the period from November 2020 to November 2022. It will be submitted for approval by Institutional Review Board, faculty of medicine, Mansoura University.

Eligibility criteria:

The study population will be on patients referred to the vascular surgery department suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with exhausted upper-extremity and chest wall vascular accesses.

Inclusion:

In this study, The investigator will include all ESRD patients belonging to the age group (≥ 15 years) who complain of exhaustion of all upper extremity vascular accesses.

Exclusion:

The investigators will exclude patients with previous history or evident deep venous thrombosis (DVT), varicose veins, femoral vein stenosis, arterial insufficiency, severe groin or limb infection.

Preoperative assessment:

A comprehensive history will be taken from the patients with regard to patient's demographics, underlying medical conditions, duration since the starting of haemodialysis, previous trials of vascular access, history of DVT and arterial insufficiency.

Also, patients will be examined to exclude any possibility for upper extremity vascular access. A meticulous examination of both lower limbs is done to assess the possibility of infection, signs of venous stenosis or arterial inefficiency including palpation of accessible lower limb arteries.

Routine laboratory investigations are carried out for all patients including complete blood count, liver function tests, renal function tests, arterial blood gases, bleeding and coagulation profiles, fasting and 2hr-postprandial serum glucose level, lipid profile, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Further investigations include duplex ultrasonography (US) assessing for both superficial and deep venous system of the both lower limb. Bilateral lower limb arterial duplex is done to exclude any arterial disease. Also, a preoperative venous mapping of lower limb veins is mandatory.

Procedures and Postoperative care:

Procedures:

1. Tunneled femoral catheter: a standard technique is adopted according to the study performed by Herzallah using long tunneled catheter.

2. Femoral artery-femoral arteriovenous graft: a straight or loop configuration Ponikvar

Endpoints and Follow-up:

Every patient will be followed every week until first month, then every 3 months until the end of the first years so that the hemodynamic improvement will be assessed.

Primary outcome:

• Evaluation of primary patency rates within the study follow-up time frame.

* In case of TFC: Normally an extracorporeal blood flow should be about 300 ml/min. based on this, the catheter dysfunction can be defined by the first occurrence of either peak blood flow of 200 ml per minute or less for 30 minutes during a dialysis treatment, mean blood flow of 250 ml per minute or less during two consecutive dialysis treatments, or inability to initiate dialysis owing to inadequate blood flow, after attempts to restore patency have been attempted.

* In case of AVG, stenosis \> 50% of the prosthesis diameter or complete occlusion is considered significant. This can be assessed by duplex ultrasonography every six months or when the patency is questionable.

The patency rates will be determined according to the reporting standards, set by the Committee of Reporting Standards for arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses

Secondary outcome:

* The secondary patency: the patency rates will be determined according to the reporting standards, set by the Committee of Reporting Standards for arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses

* The special adverse events complicating lower-extremity hemodialysis access. The severity of arteriovenous access complications will be graded according to the Reporting Standards document . Complications are defined according Clavien-Dindo.

* Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a validated tool, the vascular access score questionnaire, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

* Besides, operative time, hospital stay, and survival rate will be assessed.

Sample size calculation:

Based on the average of the primary outcome (primary patency), a previous study showed that the mean rate in AVGs at 6 months was 53%, while another study showed that the mean rate in TFC at six months was 14%.

Using sample size calculation software (www.clincalc.com), a minimum of 44 patients will be needed to achieve a study power of 80% with alpha set at 5%. Estimating a drop-out rate and loss to follow-up of 10%, a total of 48 patients will be ultimately included.

Random sequence generation and blinding:

Patients will be randomized to one of two groups; group I Tunneled femoral catheter and group II Femoral artery-femoral vein graft.

Randomization will be undertaken by the sealed envelope method using randomization software. Neither the operating surgeons nor the assessors during the follow-up will be aware about patients' participation in the study.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-12-01
• Study First Submitted: 2021-01-10
• Status Verified: 2021-02
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-02-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-02-04
• Study First Posted: 2021-02-10
• Last Update Posted: 2021-02-10
• Primary Completion: 2022-12-01
• Study Completion: 2022-12-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 48

Inclusion Criteria

• All end-stage renal disease patients who complain of exhaustion of all upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses.
• ≥ 15 years

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• patients with previous history or evident deep venous thrombosis
• varicose veins
• femoral vein stenosis
• arterial insufficiency
• severe groin or limb infection.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Tunneled femoral catheter	Tunneled Femoral Catheter (TFC) group	20 patients with end stage renal disease and exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses will be randomly allocated to this group
Femoral artery-femoral arteriovenous graft	Femoro-femoral Arteriovenous graft (FF-AVG) group	a straight or loop configuration 28patients with end stage renal disease and exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses will be randomly allocated to this group

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Primary patency	12 months postoperatively	In case of TFC: Normally an extracorporeal blood flow should be about 300 ml/min. based on this, the catheter dysfunction can be defined by the first occurrence of either (1) peak blood flow of 200 ml per minute or less for 30 minutes during a dialysis treatment, (2) mean blood flow of 250 ml per minute or less during two consecutive dialysis treatments, or (3) inability to initiate dialysis owing to inadequate blood flow, after attempts to restore patency have been attempted.; - In case of AVG, stenosis \> 50% of the prosthesis diameter or complete occlusion is considered significant. This can be assessed by duplex ultrasonography every six months or when the patency is questionable. The patency rates will be determined according to the reporting standards, set by the Committee of Reporting Standards for arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Secondary patency	24 months	the patency rates will be determined according to the reporting standards, set by the Committee of Reporting Standards for arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses.
Special adverse events complicating lower-extremity haemodialysis access	24 months	The severity of arteriovenous access complications will be graded according to the Reporting Standards document. Complications are defined according Clavien-Dindo.
Patient satisfaction	6 & 12 months postoperatively	assessed using a validated tool, the vascular access score questionnaire

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mohammed Mosallam Mohammed Ibrahim; 🇪🇬 Mansoura, Dakahleyya, Egypt