Comparison of New Suture Anchor Technique for Bony Mallet Injury Versus Conservative Treatment
- Conditions
- Finger InjuriesFinger FractureFinger Mallet
- Interventions
- Procedure: Suture anchor techniqueProcedure: Conservative Treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT03228849
- Lead Sponsor
- Istanbul University
- Brief Summary
This study aims to compare conservative treatment versus a new suture anchor technique for bony mallet finger in 29 patients.
- Detailed Description
This study aims to compare conservative treatment versus a new suture anchor technique for bony mallet finger in 29 patients who presented to investigators' clinic between 2013 and 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to conservative or surgical treatment groups. Patients in the conservative group were followed with immobilization with aluminum splint and physical therapy. Patients in the surgical group were treated with investigators' new surgical suture anchor technique and then received physical therapy. The patients were followed for 12 months. Primary study outcomes were extension deficit, days to return to work and DIP flexion.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 29
- Wehbe Schneider type 1 - 2 and type A - B fractures
- ability to provide closed reduction
- patients' voluntariness
- Wehbe Schneider type C and type 3 fractures
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Surgical Treatment Suture anchor technique Patients were treated with the new suture anchor technique and after 6 weeks were started on physical therapy for 2 weeks. Conservative Treatment Conservative Treatment Patients were treated with 6 weeks with splinting and were then started on physical therapy for 2 weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Extension deficit 12 months The inability to actively extend DIP joint to 0 degrees.
DIP flexion 12 months The maximum angle of flexion at DIP joint
Days to return to work Starting from the date of the start of treatment until patients returns to work, assessed up to 12 months Time to return to work
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine
🇹🇷Istanbul, Turkey