Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03591705
NCT03591705RecruitingNot Applicable

Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization With Hepatic Artery Chemotherapy Infusion for Patients With Potentially Resectable HCC

Sun Yat-sen University1 site in 1 country240 target enrollmentStarted: July 6, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
240
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
progression-free survival

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most commonly malignant tumors around the world. Hepatic resection or liver transplantation is the radical method to cure the disease. However, due to large tumors, surgical treatment is suitable for early-stage and well-reserved liver function patients. Therefore, in clinical practice, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a preferential and standard treatment of potentially resectable HCC.

EACH trial opened the door to FOLFOX-based system chemotherapy for advanced HCC patients. Recently, investigators have showed that hepatic arterial infusion of FOLFOX-based chemotherapy (HAIC) was safe and efficient for HCC patients. Several clinical studies showed that HAIC bring better tumor response rate that the conditional TACE. The combination of TACE with HAIC (TACE-HAIC), theoretically can significantly increase the local doses of chemotherapeutic agents in the liver, reduce the viability of HCC cells and increase the hepatectomy rate. However, this hasn't been verified in clinical application. To identify a more effective and safety way for treating potentially resectable HCC patients, this study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy between HAIC and TACE-HAIC for those patients.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-75 years
  • The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)
  • Diagnosed as potentially resectable with consensus by the panel of liver surgeons
  • stage BCLC A/B, without extra-hepatic involvement
  • No previous anti-HCC treatment
  • Eastern Co-operative Group performance status 2 or less
  • Liver function: Child's A or B (score < 7)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy
  • underlying serve cardiac or renal diseases
  • Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial
  • Patients ineligible for hepatic artery embolization

Arms & Interventions

TACE-HAIC

Experimental

hepatic artery chemo-lipiodolization with EADM, followed by FOLFOX-based chemotherapy artery infusion

Intervention: TACE-HAIC (Drug)

HAIC

Active Comparator

FOLFOX-based chemotherapy hepatic artery infusion

Intervention: HAIC (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

progression-free survival

Time Frame: 6-12 months

Time to progression, last follow-up or death after random assignment to TACE-HAIC or HAIC

Secondary Outcomes

  • overall survival(6-12 months)
  • Downstage hepatectomy rate(6-12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Yunfei Yuan

Professor

Sun Yat-sen University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials