Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05021458
NCT05021458
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Gong's Mobilization and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide on Pain and Range of Motion in Office Workers With Cervical Spine Overload

Riphah International University1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentAugust 5, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cervical Spine Sprain
Sponsor
Riphah International University
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pain of patient
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Neck pain is a frequent and disabling complaint in the general population. One of the most common causes of neck pain is mechanical dysfunction of the cervical spine. Although diverse methods have been proposed for increasing cervical range of motion (ROM), joint mobilization has been confirmed as effective in several studies. Typically, joint mobilization methods for increasing cervical ROM include spinal manipulative therapy, the activator and diversified techniques. There are different mobilization techniques for neck pain, and mulligan's technique is one of them. It has two techniques Sustain Natural Apophyseal Glides (snags) and Natural Apophyseal Glides (nags). Gong's mobilization technique helps to heal physical pain as well as distract the mind from stress. In this study, the effectiveness of gong's mobilization and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (snags) will be compared in office workers who have problems with cervical posture and range of motion (ROM) in order to examine the effects of gong's mobilization on cervical pain and cervical ROM. Twenty office workers with problems of cervical posture, pain and ROM is divided into a gong's mobilization group (n=10) and a Snags group (n=10). Gong's mobilization and nags will be administered three times a week for four weeks to each respective group and then changes in cervical posture, pain and cervical ROM will be evaluated.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 5, 2021
End Date
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • • Both Gender
  • Aged 25 to 45 years
  • Participants actively working in offices and who had been diagnosed with or self-reported chronic non-specific neck pain.

Exclusion Criteria

  • • Surgical treatment of cervical spine (Cervical Diskectomy)
  • Tumor around the neck
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Nervous system disorder(Vestibular disorder)
  • Whiplash Injury

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pain of patient

Time Frame: 4 weeks

NPRS The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Function

Time Frame: 4 weeks

Item scores range from 0 to 5, and the total score is a total of the item scores (possible range 0 (no pain) - 100 (maximal pain)

universal Goniometer

Time Frame: 4 weeks

range of joint

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials