The 'Young Adult Taking Action' Programme for Young Adult Cancer Survivors: a Feasibility Study Evaluating Content and Delivery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 19
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Acceptability; Affective attitude
研究概览
简要总结
Young adult cancer survivors (YACS) aged 18-39 report physical and psychosocial late effects following cancer treatment, impairing quality of life and participation in everyday life. To address such multifactorial challenges complex or multicomponent rehabilitation interventions are needed. Based on this, the 'Young Adult Taking Action' (YATAC) programme was developed to increase participation in everyday life and improve health-related quality of life. The development of the intervention is guided by the British Medical Research Council's guidance (MRC) and the framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions by Hawkins et al.
The present study will investigate the acceptability and fidelity of the intervention at the research clinic of REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care in Nyborg, Denmark. A mixed method one-armed feasibility study will be conducted and the results of the study will be used to revise version 1.0 of the programme.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 39 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Being between 18-39 years old at baseline
- •Have had any type of cancer
- •Have completed primary/active cancer directed treatment (cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or definitive surgical intervention, while current hormonal treatments or maintenance therapies are permissible)
- •Determined a need for rehabilitation determined by the REHPA scale (a linear analogue scale, where the participants indicate how close they are to living the life they desire after ending cancer treatment). The scale ranges from 0= 'goal reached' to 9= 'infinitely far from'
- •Have access to a device with Internet options (i.e., smartphone or tablet)
排除标准
- •Dependent in basic personal activities of daily living (personal care, dressing and eating)
- •No permanent residence in Denmark
- •Not able to speak and understand Danish
结局指标
主要结局
Acceptability; Affective attitude
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants feelings about the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating better feeling.
Fidelity
时间窗: 10 weeks
Defined as the consistency of whether the intervention was implemented as intended. The professionals register to what extent they have implemented the session as intended on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher consistency.
Dose
时间窗: 10 weeks
Defined as the quantity of intervention implemented. The professionals will report the number of elements implemented and the time used. In addition, the professional will give information on reasons for deviation from the manual.
Adaptions
时间窗: 10 weeks
Defined as any adjustments made to the intervention. The professionals register and describe any adaptions they make and the reasons for this.
Acceptability; burden
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants perceived amount of effort required to participate. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating high degree of effort.
Acceptability; Ethicality
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants opinion about the intervention's fit with their individuals value system. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher consistency with value system.
Acceptability; intervention cohesion
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants understanding of the intervention and how it works. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher understanding of the intervention.
Acceptability; opportunity costs
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants experience of opportunity costs, like benefits, values, or profits that must be given up to engage in the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher degree of giving up on opportunity costs, like benefits, values, or profits.
Acceptability; Perceived effectiveness
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants experience of perceived effectiveness of the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher degree of perceived effectiveness of the intervention.
Acceptability; Self-efficacy
时间窗: 10 weeks
The participants confidence that they can perform the behavior(s) required to participate in the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher confidence that they can perform the behavior(s) required to participate in the intervention.
次要结局
未报告次要终点