Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00694954
NCT00694954CompletedNot Applicable

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Capsule Endoscopy vs Standard Care in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia With Suspected Obscure / Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding

University of Calgary2 sites in 1 country160 target enrollmentStarted: February 2007Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
160
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
diagnostic yield

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with obscure / occult gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding remains unclear. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial is designed to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of patients with obscure GI bleeding who receive CE compared to those who receive usual standard care.

Detailed Description

Patients with iron deficiency anemia from suspected occult GI bleeding will be randomized to receive CE or usual standard care following a negative gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Our primary outcome measure (diagnostic yield) and secondary outcome measures (noted below) will be determined after one year of followup. Patients with have a minimum of one year of clinical followup. Direct health care costs in each arm of the study will be determined after a minimum of two years of followup.

An economic evaluation based on the results of the clinical trial is also planned.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients age over 18years with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). IDA is defined as hemoglobin <137g/L in men or <120g/L in women with serum ferritin level <22ug/L in men and <10ug/L in women.
  • Eligible patients should have a negative gastroscopy and negative colonoscopy within 1 year prior to entry into study.
  • Negative celiac screen and /or negative small bowel biopsies

Exclusion Criteria

  • Overt gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Premenopausal women with menorrhagia
  • Known or suspected small bowel obstruction
  • Serious medical co-morbidities precluding surgery given the risk of capsule impaction
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Arms & Interventions

1

Experimental

Wireless capsule endoscopy

Intervention: Diagnostic Test - Given Imaging Pillcam (Device)

2

Active Comparator

Standard Care

Intervention: Diagnostics (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

diagnostic yield

Time Frame: 48 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • number of hospitalizations for GI bleeding/anemia(48 weeks)
  • number of GI-related procedures and investigations(48)
  • number of blood transfusions(48 weeks)
  • quality of life(48)
  • health care costs(2 years)
  • procedure-related complications(48)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr. Robert Hilsden

Associate Professor

University of Calgary

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Capsule Endoscopy vs Standard of Care for... | Clinical Trial