跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07336121
NCT07336121已完成不适用

Assessment of Outcome and Tolerability of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children With Acute Respiratory Distress

Ain Shams University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2023年1月9日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Improvement in lung aeration assessed by lung ultrasound score

研究概览

简要总结

Acute breathing problems are a common reason for children to be admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, and many of these children need breathing support without a breathing tube. High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) and nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) are commonly used to help children breathe, but there is limited information comparing how well they work and how comfortable they are for children. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and tolerability of HVNI and nCPAP in children aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, using clinical assessment and lung ultrasound findings.

详细描述

Acute respiratory distress represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in infants and young children and accounts for a significant proportion of pediatric intensive care unit admissions. A considerable number of affected children fail conventional low-flow oxygen therapy and require escalation to non-invasive respiratory support.

High Velocity Nasal Insufflation delivers heated and humidified oxygen at high flow rates through nasal cannulae and may improve oxygenation by washing out nasopharyngeal dead space, reducing inspiratory resistance, and providing a degree of positive end-expiratory pressure. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure delivers a continuous distending airway pressure with supplemental oxygen, improving lung recruitment, reducing atelectasis, and enhancing ventilation-perfusion matching.

Both modalities are commonly used in pediatric intensive care practice; however, evidence comparing their clinical effectiveness, tolerability, and impact on lung aeration in young children remains inconclusive. Lung ultrasound has emerged as a reliable, non-invasive bedside tool for assessment of lung aeration and disease severity in critically ill children.

This prospective interventional study will enroll 80 children aged 1 month to 5 years admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with acute respiratory distress who have failed low-flow oxygen therapy. Patients will be randomized into two groups: one group receiving High Velocity Nasal Insufflation and the other receiving nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. All patients will undergo daily clinical assessment and lung ultrasound scoring during their pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay. Tolerability will be evaluated using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scale.

The primary outcome is improvement in lung aeration as assessed by lung ultrasound score. Secondary outcomes include assessment of clinical response to therapy based on respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and need for escalation of respiratory support . The results of this study aim to provide evidence to guide selection of optimal non-invasive respiratory support in children with acute respiratory distress.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
1 Month 至 5 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Children aged 1 month to 5 years
  • Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)
  • Diagnosed with acute respiratory distress
  • Failure of low-flow nasal oxygen therapy
  • Requiring non-invasive respiratory support
  • Informed consent obtained from parent or legal guardian

排除标准

  • Presence of congenital or acquired cardiac disease
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Chronic lung disease
  • History of recurrent wheezing
  • History of cardio-respiratory arrest
  • Presence of significant comorbid chronic illness
  • Contraindication to non-invasive ventilation

研究组 & 干预措施

High Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI)

Active Comparator

Children aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress admitted to the PICU will receive respiratory support using High Velocity Nasal Insufflation after failure of low-flow oxygen therapy. Outcomes and tolerability will be assessed clinically and by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay.

干预措施: High Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) (Device)

Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (Nasal CPAP)

Active Comparator

Children aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress admitted to the PICU will receive respiratory support using nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure after failure of low-flow oxygen therapy. Outcomes and tolerability will be assessed clinically and by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay.

干预措施: Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (Nasal CPAP) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Improvement in lung aeration assessed by lung ultrasound score

时间窗: At Baseline, pre procedural , 48 hours .

To compare the effectiveness of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in improving lung aeration in children with acute respiratory distress, assessed by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay. The LUS ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate worse lung aeration and lower scores indicate improvement.

次要结局

  • Clinical improvement of respiratory distress assessed by Modified Respiratory Distress Score(Baseline and 48 hours after initiation of respiratory support)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验