Intervention for Intrusive Negative Thinking
- Conditions
- Intrusive Negative Thinking
- Interventions
- Other: Sensory attention training
- Registration Number
- NCT02394704
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Brief Summary
Intrusive negative thinking styles such as rumination are typical of many psychiatric disorders, are difficult to treat, and predict poor treatment outcome. The investigators propose to evaluate a new intervention for negative thinking that capitalizes and builds on the preserved ability to attend to physical sensation. The investigators will examine changes in physiological mechanisms and symptoms.
- Detailed Description
Intrusive negative cognitions are key features of many psychiatric disorders, are difficult to treat, and predict poor outcomes in conventional and neurobehavioral interventions. Here, we evaluate the extent to which a novel intervention capitalizing on a preserved neurocircuitry for attending to evolutionarily salient somatosensory stimuli can be used to train attentional mechanisms to override otherwise pre-potent negative cognitions. The initial period will involve open-label intervention refinement and mechanistic evaluation of mechanism; N=35 individuals with high levels of intrusive negative cognitions and dysphoria will be assessed pre/post intervention in the graded sensory training condition. Success will suggest a new intervention pathway for a traditionally treatment-resistant dimension of psychopathology. The second phase will be a randomized trial of 70 participants equally allocated to graded and non-graded training conditions.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 194
Not provided
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- Current alcohol or substance dependence
- Psychotic disorders or psychosis
- Neurological disorders (stroke, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, epilepsy, etc.)
- Inability to complete questionnaires in English. The justification is that many of the primary analyses involve assessment of change in self-reported symptoms using measures normed in English. Participants must thus be able to read those measures to give valid indications of the extent to which they have responded to the intervention.
- Current use of any psychotropic drugs thought to affect learning, including antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, stimulants, and anti-Parkinsonian drugs. Current is defined as within 2 weeks of testing, 4 weeks for fluoxetine.
- Chronic pain that could be exacerbated by transcutaneous electrical stimulation
- Having any eye problems or difficulties in corrected vision or hearing
- Having a North American Adult Reading Test (NAART) equivalent Full Scale Intelligence Quotient < 85
- Being pregnant. Determined by self-report at the interview and by a pregnancy test
- Severe or poorly controlled concurrent medical disorders that may cause thinking disruptions or require medication that could cause negative thinking
- Current use of medications that could cause affect thinking symptoms. That is, participants need to be able to think clearly to complete the proposed information processing tasks. And they need to be able to learn to be able to make use of the intervention. Medications which compromise clear thinking or which block learning will thus be considered exclusion criteria.
- Any implanted electrical device (pacemaker, vagus nerve stimulator implant, etc.) or prior treatment with a vagus nerve stimulator
- Underwent electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) < 9 months prior to study entry.
- People who have foreign objects in their body that are not cleared for safety at 3 Tesla scanning, such as aneurysm clips or pacemakers, will be excluded from the fMRI portion of the study.
- Participants deemed "not a good fit" for the study for other reasons (such as, but not limited to, continually arriving late or rescheduling, not being a trustworthy historian or accurate reporter of symptoms, being belligerent with study staff, or presenting an active suicide risk) can also be excluded.
- Any heart condition
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Graded sensory attention training Sensory attention training Sensory stimuli will begin at a maximal tolerable intensity and decrease in intensity throughout the training, to shift from involuntary to voluntary attentional focus. Non-graded sensory attention training Sensory attention training Sensory stimuli will begin and be maintained at a minimal detectable intensity to maximize voluntary attentional training.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sustained attention composite (computer based tasks and physiological measures) two weeks (five intervention days) Sustained attention is operationalized by performance on computer-based tasks (sensitivity, reaction times) and associated physiological measures (pupil dilation, eye movements, heart rate, EEG) and central measures (fMRI derived reactivity in affect, somatosensory, and attention networks). These metrics will be interpreted together as a meta-analytic composite by counting the number of component measures with significant change in association with the intervention in comparison to a permutation-test derived critical number of indices change under the null hypothesis given the autocorrelation of the administered measures.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Depressive severity (patient self-report) two weeks (five intervention days) Clinical variables determined by patient self-report.
Rumination (patient self-report) two weeks (five intervention days) Clinical variables determined by patient self-report.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Oxford Building
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States