Retrospective, Real-life Observational Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mixed Maintenance and Reliever Inhaler Types in Patients in the Management of Asthma in a Representative UK Primary Care Population

Brief Summary

Detailed Description

Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes. Inhalation therapy is the cornerstone of asthma treatment, used for the delivery of 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy (e.g. salbutamol) as well as anti-inflammatory corticosteroid 'maintenance' or 'controller' therapy. Currently available inhaler devices include MDIs, breath-actuated MDIs (BAIs), and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Both BAIs and DPIs are actuated by the patient's inhalation manoeuvre, while MDIs are actuated by the patient's pressing of a button, which must thus be coordinated with inhalation. The clinical effectiveness of inhalation therapy derives from delivery of drug to the target sites in the lungs, and evidence is mounting that suboptimal use of inhaler devices is a common problem contributing to compromised asthma control for many patients. Indeed, decreased asthma control has been linked to the number of mistakes when using MDIs for delivering inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). There is also evidence that the ability of patients to use the different inhaler device types is variable. Nonetheless, recent reviews of RCTs, while recognising the importance of inhaler technique, have concluded that inhaler devices do not differ significantly in efficacy and that the cheapest inhaler device should be used. However, as results are based on RCTs they should be applied with care in light of the aforementioned issues around external validity of RCTs and the ability to extrapolate their findings across a broad patient population. Moreover, patients enrolled in RCTs typically receive extensive training and must demonstrate and maintain proper inhaler technique, seldom accomplished in a real-world setting. The aim of this study is to compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of ICS (maintenance) plus SABA (reliever) therapy delivered via same-type devices (namely BDP via EB plus salbutamol via EB \[BAI\]) and that delivered via different device types (i.e. BDP via EB \[BAI\] plus SABA via MDI) in a real-life, representative, UK primary care asthma population.

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

• Treatment success 1(One-year outcome period)
• Treatment success 2 (independent of possible cost savings)(One-year outcome period)
• Respiratory-related hospitalisations and referrals.(One-year outcome period)