DRKS00006957
Completed
Not Applicable
ltra-mini PCNL vs. flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10 – 20 mm - UMP vs. FURS costs
niversitätsklinikum FreiburgKlinik für Urologie0 sites60 target enrollmentOctober 21, 2014
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- N20.0
- Sponsor
- niversitätsklinikum FreiburgKlinik für Urologie
- Enrollment
- 60
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Renal stone 10 \- 20 mm
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
ltra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureterorenoscopy: Evaluation of outcome, perioperative complications and analgetic consumption for the treatment of patients with kidney stonesN20Calculus of kidney and ureterDRKS00007478niversitätsklinikum FreiburgDepartment für ChirurgieKlinik für Urologie50
Completed
Phase 2
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal SurgeryRenal StoneNCT06249100Ain Shams University130
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNLSurgery-ComplicationsNephrolithiasis Staghorn CalculusSafety IssuesNCT06288022Mahidol University130
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Ureteral Access Sheath or Percutaneous Nephrostomy During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Which is Better?Flexible UreteroscopyNCT05633030Benha University100
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of of PCNL(percutaneous nephrolithotomy) and RIRS(retrograde intrarenal surgery) for renal stone less than 20 mmHealth Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: N200- Calculus of kidneyCTRI/2021/08/035645Deptt of Urology AIIMS Raipur