跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04601480
NCT04601480已完成不适用

PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Current Opioid-User Population

University of Minnesota2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 309 人开始时间: 2020年8月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
309
试验地点
2
主要终点
Opioid Tapering Rate, Category 1

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this research is to assess the effects of electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tools on primary care provider (PCP) decision-making around pain treatment and opioid prescribing. The decision support tools are informed by principles of "behavioral economics," whereby clinicians are "nudged," though never forced, towards guideline-concordant care.

详细描述

To test the effects of these decision support tools for improving the quality of care for pain treatment, the investigators will implement a pragmatic clinic-randomized trial across the primary care clinics of Fairview Medical Group and University of Minnesota Physicians.

The study has two parallel components. The decision support tools to be tested will differ somewhat depending on whether a given patient is opioid-naïve, or whether a given patient is a current opioid-user. Four sets of analyses will be conducted separately: one for the opioid-naïve group using EHR data, one for the current opioid-user group using EHR data, one at the PCP-level using web survey data, and one at the PCP-level using MN Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All primary care providers from all of the Fairview and University of Minnesota Physicians study clinics

排除标准

  • Primary care providers who work less than 20% full time equivalent (FTE)

结局指标

主要结局

Opioid Tapering Rate, Category 1

时间窗: 12 months

Outcome reported as the proportion of the opioid-refill-eligible visits per PCP that fall into each of the 3 categories: Category 1/Appropriate Taper: Whether a Primary care visit (PCV) with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME by no greater than 20%, relative to the current prescription, and there is documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines. Category 2/Inappropriate Taper: Whether a PCV with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME without documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines, or, decreased MME by greater amounts than recommended (\>20% relative reduction in MME). Category 3/No Taper: Whether a PCV with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had no reduction in MME.

Opioid Tapering Rate, Category 2

时间窗: 12 months

Outcome reported as the proportion of the opioid-refill-eligible visits per PCP that fall into each of the 3 categories: Category 1/Appropriate Taper: Whether a Primary care visit (PCV) with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME by no greater than 20%, relative to the current prescription, and there is documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines. Category 2/Inappropriate Taper: Whether a PCV with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME without documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines, or, decreased MME by greater amounts than recommended (\>20% relative reduction in MME). Category 3/No Taper: Whether a PCV with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had no reduction in MME.

Opioid Tapering Rate, Category 3

时间窗: 12 months

Outcome reported as the proportion of the opioid-refill-eligible visits per PCP that fall into each of the 3 categories: Category 1/Appropriate Taper: Whether a Primary care visit (PCV) with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME by no greater than 20%, relative to the current prescription, and there is documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines. Category 2/Inappropriate Taper: Whether a PCV with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME without documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines, or, decreased MME by greater amounts than recommended (\>20% relative reduction in MME). Category 3/No Taper: Whether a PCV with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had no reduction in MME.

次要结局

  • Prescription Reduction vs Discontinuation Rate(12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验