MedPath

PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Current Opioid-User Population

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Opioid Use
Opioid Abuse
Opioid-use Disorder
Interventions
Behavioral: PMP Integration & Nudge
Behavioral: Choice Architecture Nudge
Registration Number
NCT04601480
Lead Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Brief Summary

The objective of this research is to assess the effects of electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tools on primary care provider (PCP) decision-making around pain treatment and opioid prescribing. The decision support tools are informed by principles of "behavioral economics," whereby clinicians are "nudged," though never forced, towards guideline-concordant care.

Detailed Description

To test the effects of these decision support tools for improving the quality of care for pain treatment, the investigators will implement a pragmatic clinic-randomized trial across the primary care clinics of Fairview Medical Group and University of Minnesota Physicians.

The study has two parallel components. The decision support tools to be tested will differ somewhat depending on whether a given patient is opioid-naïve, or whether a given patient is a current opioid-user. Four sets of analyses will be conducted separately: one for the opioid-naïve group using EHR data, one for the current opioid-user group using EHR data, one at the PCP-level using web survey data, and one at the PCP-level using MN Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
631
Inclusion Criteria
  • All primary care providers from all of the Fairview and University of Minnesota Physicians study clinics
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Primary care providers who work less than 20% full time equivalent (FTE)
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PMP Integration & NudgePMP Integration & NudgeClinics in this arm will receive the Prescription Drug Monitoring (PMP) Integration \& Nudge intervention.
Choice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & NudgePMP Integration & NudgeClinics in this arm will receive both the choice architecture nudge and prescription drug monitoring (PMP) integration \& nudge interventions.
Choice Architecture NudgeChoice Architecture NudgeClinics in this arm will receive the choice architecture nudge intervention.
Choice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture NudgeClinics in this arm will receive both the choice architecture nudge and prescription drug monitoring (PMP) integration \& nudge interventions.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Opioid Tapering Rate12 months

Outcome reported as the percent of Primary Care Appointments (PCAs) at each clinic that fall into each of 3 categories:

Appropriate Taper: Whether a PCA with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME by no greater than 20%, relative to the current prescription, and there is documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines.

Inappropriate Taper: Whether a PCA with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had an order that would reduce MME without documented evidence that the reduction was consistent with CDC guidelines, or, decreased MME by greater amounts than recommended (\>20% relative reduction in MME).

No Taper: Whether a PCP with someone currently receiving a "high risk" opioid had no reduction in MME.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Prescription Reduction vs Discontinuation Rate12 months

Outcome reported as the percent of Primary Care Appointments (PCAs) at each clinic that fall into one of 2 categories: Partial reduction in the MME or prescription length of refill order, versus a total opioid discontinuation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Minnesota

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath