Evaluation of Healing Following Open Gluteus Medius Repair with Biointegrative Implant

Active, not recruiting

• Conditions: Tendon Injuries; Orthopedic Procedures; Hip Injuries
• Interventions: Device: Standard gluteus medius repair with Tapestry Biointegrative implant

• Registration Number: NCT05492396
• Lead Sponsor: Ohio State University

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, single-center study design with enrollment of 15 subjects. The 15 subjects will all undergo standard gluteus medius repair that includes augmentation with the biointegrative implant. This is a small observational study. As such, we expect that the results from 15 subjects will give an adequate understanding of post surgical healing.

Detailed Description

Surgical gluteal tendon repair is a procedure performed regularly in operating rooms everywhere. This procedure is normally recommended to address gluteal tendon tears after nonoperative treatment options have been exhausted. However, less than satisfactory long-term outcomes can be common after open gluteal tendon repair. The augmentation of tendon repairs via various biointegrative implants is becoming more common in clinical practice, however very little, if any, of the literature details the healing after surgical intervention.

Biointegrative implants have been studied for the use of augmenting other tendon repairs, such as rotator cuff tears. Successful complete rotator cuff repairs augmented with a collagen-based implant have indicated that biointegrative implants are a safe option that may provide greater rates of healing and more positive long-term outcomes (Thon SG, 2019). Rates of healing and long-term outcomes when using a patch of this sort in other tendons such as the gluteal tendon in the hip show promise and demonstrate that there is a need for this area of study.

A 2016 study evaluated augmenting gluteus medius repair with a bioinductive implant, but the surgery was performed using endoscopic technique. There is no literature studying the healing of collagen-based implants for open gluteal tendon repairs. Although clinical outcomes show similar level of improvement for endoscopic and open gluteal tendon tear repair (Maslaris A, 2020), open repair technique with more anchors may be required for larger or more intricate tears.

This is a prospective, single-center study design with enrollment of 15 subjects. The 15 subjects will all undergo standard gluteus medius repair that includes augmentation with the biointegrative implant. This is a small observational study. As such, we expect that the results from 15 subjects will give an adequate understanding of post surgical healing.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-08-01
• Study First Submitted: 2022-08-02
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-08-04
• Study First Posted: 2022-08-08
• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-25
• Last Update Posted: 2025-03-30
• Primary Completion: 2025-10
• Study Completion: 2026-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients at least 18 years of age
2. Patients healthy enough to undergo procedure
3. Large partial tear and full thickness gluteal tendon tear requiring augmentation
4. Willing and able to make all required visits
5. Able to read and write in English

Exclusion Criteria

1. Hypersensitivity or objection to using bovine derived materials
2. Significant atrophy or major retraction of gluteal tendon
3. Women who are pregnant or nursing
4. History of poor compliance with medical treatment
5. Patients who are incarcerated

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Standard gluteus medius repair	Standard gluteus medius repair with Tapestry Biointegrative implant	Subjects will all undergo standard gluteus medius repair that includes augmentation with the biointegrative implant.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Assess overall tissue quality by ultrasound assessment	6 month	Graded as 'Intact/Attenuated/Disrupted'. Intact being the positive outcome, disrupted being the negative outcome.
Assess overall tissue thickness by ultrasound assessment	6 month	Unit measured in centimeters
Assess overall tissue organization by ultrasound assessment	6 month	Hypoechoic signal present or absent. Present being the positive outcome, absent being the negative outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
International Hip Outcome Tool questionnaire	Screening, 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month, 12 months	Assesses deficiencies with respect to outcome assessment of patients with hip disorders. Scores range from 0-100. Higher scores represent better quality of life.
Modified Harris Hip Score questionnaire	Screening, 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month, 12 months	Measures the functional status of the hip. Scores range from 0-100 where 100 means best functional outcome and least pain

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute; 🇺🇸 Columbus, Ohio, United States

Ohio State Outpatient Care New Albany; 🇺🇸 Westerville, Ohio, United States

The Ohio State University Hospital East; 🇺🇸 Columbus, Ohio, United States