跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02859753
NCT02859753已完成不适用

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Response and Recurrence Rates Following Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy (MCT) Versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 35 人开始时间: 2014年1月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
35
试验地点
2
主要终点
Time to disease progression according to American Society of Interventional Radiology criteria

研究概览

简要总结

To date, the majority of studies that have evaluated the efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions in cirrhotic patients and compared its efficacy with that of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for local recurrence and survival have been retrospective. There have been no prospective randomized studies comparing percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) with RFA for ablated tumour volume, the response after one session, local recurrence rates in the first year, complication rates and survival at 3 and 5 years for HCC lesions > 2 cm in patients with Child-Pugh A and B cirrhosis. The hypothesis the investigators wish to explore is that though the 2 methods are equivalent for lesions ≤ 2 cm, MWA could show better efficacy with a similar risk for lesions > 2 cm and for lesions close to vessels ≥ 3 mm in diameter, as shown in retrospective studies.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient who have been informed about the research and given their oral consent
  • Patients with national health insurance cover
  • Patients ≥ 18 years
  • ≤ 3 CHC lesions ≤ 4 cm, with a maximum of 3 lesions with a diagnosis of HCC based on histology, or according to European Society for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria
  • Chronic liver disease or cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score between 5 and 8 points
  • Contra-indication for surgical resection at the time of the therapeutic decision made during a multidisciplinary meeting

排除标准

  • Informed consent not obtained (refusal of patient or patient lacking discernment)
  • Kidney failure with creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min thus preventing the injection of contrast for the initial or follow-up radiological imaging
  • Presence of a malignant tumour other than the HCC at the time of the diagnosis, unless a basocellular carcinoma
  • Cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score > 8
  • Contra-indication for percutaneous treatment according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria
  • Patients without national health insurance cover

研究组 & 干预措施

RFA

Experimental

干预措施: Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (Other)

MCT

Active Comparator

干预措施: Percutaneous Microwave Ablation (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Time to disease progression according to American Society of Interventional Radiology criteria

时间窗: Through study completion up to 5 years

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验