MedPath

Comparison of Response and Recurrence Rates Following Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy Versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Liver Disease
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Thermoablation
Interventions
Other: Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
Other: Percutaneous Microwave Ablation
Registration Number
NCT02859753
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Brief Summary

To date, the majority of studies that have evaluated the efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions in cirrhotic patients and compared its efficacy with that of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for local recurrence and survival have been retrospective. There have been no prospective randomized studies comparing percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) with RFA for ablated tumour volume, the response after one session, local recurrence rates in the first year, complication rates and survival at 3 and 5 years for HCC lesions \> 2 cm in patients with Child-Pugh A and B cirrhosis. The hypothesis the investigators wish to explore is that though the 2 methods are equivalent for lesions ≤ 2 cm, MWA could show better efficacy with a similar risk for lesions \> 2 cm and for lesions close to vessels ≥ 3 mm in diameter, as shown in retrospective studies.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient who have been informed about the research and given their oral consent
  • Patients with national health insurance cover
  • Patients ≥ 18 years
  • ≤ 3 CHC lesions ≤ 4 cm, with a maximum of 3 lesions with a diagnosis of HCC based on histology, or according to European Society for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria
  • Chronic liver disease or cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score between 5 and 8 points
  • Contra-indication for surgical resection at the time of the therapeutic decision made during a multidisciplinary meeting
Exclusion Criteria
  • Informed consent not obtained (refusal of patient or patient lacking discernment)
  • Kidney failure with creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min thus preventing the injection of contrast for the initial or follow-up radiological imaging
  • Presence of a malignant tumour other than the HCC at the time of the diagnosis, unless a basocellular carcinoma
  • Cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score > 8
  • Contra-indication for percutaneous treatment according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria
  • Patients without national health insurance cover

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
RFAPercutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation-
MCTPercutaneous Microwave Ablation-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to disease progression according to American Society of Interventional Radiology criteriaThrough study completion up to 5 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU Dijon Bourgogne

🇫🇷

Dijon, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath