跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06692660
NCT06692660尚未招募不适用

An Overview of the Use of Respiratory Support At Home in Children - Patients and Families Point of View

University Hospital, Grenoble2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2024年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
describe the perceived success of the use of the respiratory support from the parent's point of view

研究概览

简要总结

the primary outcome is to describe the perceived success of the use of the respiratory support from the parent's point of view

详细描述

The use of ventilatory support, including CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), which is a mode of ventilation with continuous positive pressure, and BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure), which is a mode of ventilation with two levels of pressure, has seen a significant increase in indications in recent years. The indications have become more numerous and increasingly complex. Sleep-related respiratory disorders, including obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, central apnea syndrome, and alveolar hypoventilation, are the primary reasons for these indications. In pediatrics, numerous conditions contribute to sleep-related respiratory disorders: ENT malformations, genetic conditions, obesity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neuromuscular diseases, thoracic deformities, and storage diseases.

The non-use or insufficient use of ventilatory support leads to a lack of treatment for sleep-related respiratory disorders. In the absence of treatment, the consequences are neurocognitive, cardiovascular, and metabolic, resulting in high morbidity. Non-use or insufficient use is a cause of failure of ventilatory support. Neither the use nor the failure of ventilatory support is clearly defined. It is crucial to evaluate the use of ventilatory support in order to correct factors related to non-use or insufficient use and to prevent the negative consequences resulting from unaddressed sleep-related respiratory disorders. This pilot study aims to assess the use of ventilatory support at home in pediatrics through interviews with patients and their parents. We will use a questionnaire designed for the study, consisting of 10 questions regarding sleep, symptoms, quality of life, technical issues, side effects, economic barriers, and adherence, to describe their experiences with ventilatory support.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
0 Years 至 17 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Children with respiratory support at home
  • •Age 0 to 18 (not yet passed) years old

排除标准

  • •Palliative care
  • •Invasive ventilation
  • •High flow oxygen therapy

结局指标

主要结局

describe the perceived success of the use of the respiratory support from the parent's point of view

时间窗: Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment

The primary outcome measure is the median score and interquartile range, obtained from the answer modalities according to the Likert scale (scores ranging from 1 to 5), in response to the question from the parent interview guide, which states: "Do you consider that the ventilatory support proposed for your child is a success? Please circle the corresponding score."

次要结局

  • Describe the persistence of symptoms under ventilatory support according to the parent.(Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment)
  • Describe the persistence of symptoms under ventilatory support according to the child(Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment)
  • Describe the tolerance of ventilatory support according to the parent.(Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment)
  • Describe the tolerance of ventilatory support according to the child.(Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment)
  • Describe adherence to ventilatory support according to the parent.(Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment)
  • Describe adherence to ventilatory support according to the child.(Assessment during the filling of the questionnaire at enrollment)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Grenoble
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验