MedPath

Comparison of Stability of Dental Implants Placed by Osseodensification Technique and Conventional Technique in upper jaw – A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Partial loss of teeth,
Registration Number
CTRI/2021/06/034454
Lead Sponsor
Government Dental College and Hospital Nagpur
Brief Summary

| |

| --- |

|Difference in the Primary and Secondary Stability of Implants Placed by two techniques (Osseodensification technique and Conventional Drilling) used for Implant Bed Preparation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
34
Inclusion Criteria
  • 1)Systemically healthy patients requiring and opting Dental Implants for replacement of missing teeth in maxilla.
  • 2)Patients Having D3 or D4 bone density.
  • 3)Patients having ability to maintain optimum oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
  • 1)Patients with systemic diseases that contraindicates the surgery, immune compromised patients.
  • 2)Past or present treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
  • 3)Pregnant or lactating females.
  • 4)Patients not willing to participate in the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary stability as implant stability quotient (ISQ) with the resonance frequency analysis deviceAt the time of Implant Placement
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary stability as implant stability quotient (ISQ) with the resonance frequency analysis deviceAt Second Stage Impalnt Surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Government Dental College and Hospital Nagpur

🇮🇳

Nagpur, MAHARASHTRA, India

Government Dental College and Hospital Nagpur
🇮🇳Nagpur, MAHARASHTRA, India
Dr Apurva Dashputra
Principal investigator
9665807740
apurvadashputra@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.