Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04025762
NCT04025762CompletedNot Applicable

An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 16 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Sensor Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

University of Cambridge2 sites in 1 country38 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
38
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Proportion of Time Spent in the Target Sensor Glucose Range During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The main objective of this open-label, multi-centre, randomised, crossover design study is to determine whether automated day and night closed-loop insulin delivery for 16 weeks under free living conditions is safer and more efficacious compared to sensor augmented insulin pump therapy in older adults with type 1 diabetes. The primary outcome is time spent in target range between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L (70 and 180 mg/dl) as recorded by CGM. Secondary outcomes are the HbA1c, time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics. Measures of human factor assessments, cardiac arrhythmias and objective sleep quality assessment will also be evaluated in this study.

Detailed Description

No study thus far has specifically evaluated use of closed-loop insulin delivery in older adults with type 1 diabetes. During our previous closed-loop studies, if there is a communication failure between the algorithm device and the insulin pump, the pump is set to deliver pre-programmed basal insulin rates after about 30 to 60 minutes.The main objective of this study is to determine whether automated day and night closed-loop insulin delivery for 16 weeks under free living conditions is safer and more efficacious compared to sensor augmented insulin pump therapy in older adults with type 1 diabetes.

This is an open-label, multi-centre, randomised, crossover design study, involving a 4-6 week run-in period, followed by two 4 months study periods during which glucose levels will be controlled either by an automated closed-loop system or by sensor-augmented pump therapy in random order. A total of up to 42 adults (aiming for 36 completed subjects) aged 60 years and older with T1D on insulin pump therapy will be recruited through diabetes clinics and other established methods in participating centres. Subjects who drop out of the study within the first 6 weeks of the first intervention period will be replaced.

Subjects will receive appropriate training in the safe use of closed-loop insulin delivery system. Subjects will have regular contact with the study team during the home study phase including 24/7 telephone support.

The primary outcome is time spent in target range between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L (70 and 180mg/dl) as recorded by CGM. Secondary outcomes are the HbA1c, time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics. Measures of human factor assessments, cardiac arrhythmia and objective sleep quality assessment will also be evaluated in this study.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
60 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age 60 years and above
  • •Type 1 diabetes as defined by WHO for at least 1 year or confirmed C-peptide negative
  • •On insulin pump for at least 3 months with good knowledge of insulin self-adjustment
  • •Treated with one of the U-100 rapid acting insulin analogues only (insulin Aspart, Lispro, Faster insulin Aspart but not Glulisine)
  • •Willing to perform regular capillary blood glucose monitoring
  • •HbA1c ≤ 10% (86 mmol/mmol) based on analysis from central laboratory or equivalent
  • •Literate in English
  • •Having a care partner who is aware of the subject's location and is trained to administer intramuscular glucagon and able to seek emergency assistance
  • •Willing to wear closed-loop system at home and at work place
  • •Willing to follow study specific instructions
  • •Willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals
  • •Has access to WiFi

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • •Use of a closed-loop system within the last 30 days
  • •Any other physical or psychological disease or condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results
  • •Use of any glucose-lowering agent (such as Pramlintide, Metformin, GLP-1 analogs) in the 3 months prior to enrolment or any use of SGLT2 inhibitors
  • •Untreated coeliac disease, adrenal insufficiency or hypothyroidism
  • •Known or suspected allergy against insulin
  • •More than one episodes of severe hypoglycaemia as defined by American Diabetes Association in preceding 6 months
  • •Random C-peptide > 200pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose >4 mmol/l (72 mg/dl)
  • •Lack of reliable telephone facility for contact
  • •Total daily insulin dose >/= 2 IU/kg/day
  • •Total daily insulin dose < 15 IU/day
  • •Severe visual impairment
  • •Severe hearing impairment
  • •Medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters or unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement
  • •Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which could potentially be used for localisation of the glucose sensor)
  • •Subject is currently abusing illicit drugs
  • •Subject is currently abusing prescription drugs
  • •Subject is currently abusing alcohol
  • •Subject has elective surgery planned that requires general anaesthesia during the course of the study
  • •Subject is a shift worker with working hours between 10pm and 8am
  • •Subject has a sickle cell disease, haemoglobinopathy; or has received red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to time of screening
  • •Subject plans to receive red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin over the course of study participation
  • •Subject diagnosed with current eating disorder such as anorexia or bulimia
  • •Subject plans to use significant quantity of herbal preparations (use of over the counter herbal preparation for 30 consecutive days or longer period during the study) or significant quantity of vitamin supplements (four times the recommended daily allowance used for 30 consecutive days or longer period during the study) known to affect glucose metabolism and/or blood glucose levels during the course of their participation in the study
  • •Subject not proficient in English (UK), or German (Austria)
  • •Additional exclusion criteria specific for Austria
  • •Positive results on urine drug screen (amphetamines/metamphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates).
  • •Positive alcohol breath test.
  • •Positive reaction to any of the following tests: hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibodies, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 antibodies, anti-HIV2 antibodies.

Arms & Interventions

Day and night hybrid closed loop control

Experimental

The day and night hybrid closed-loop system (CamAPS FX) will consist of:

  • Dana RS insulin pump (Sooil)
  • G6 real-time CGM sensor (Dexcom)
  • An unlocked android smartphone hosting the CamAPS FX app with Cambridge control algorithm

Intervention: Hybrid closed-loop system (CamAPS FX) (Device)

Sensor augmented pump therapy

Active Comparator

The comparator will consist of Dana RS insulin pump (Sooil) and G6 real-time CGM sensor (Dexcom)

Intervention: Sensor augmented pump therapy (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Proportion of Time Spent in the Target Sensor Glucose Range During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)

Time Frame: 16 weeks

Proportion of time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l (70 to 180mg/dl) based on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

Secondary Outcomes

  • HbA1c at the End of the 16 Week Intervention Period (mmol/Mol)(16 weeks)
  • Proportion of Time Spent Below Target Glucose (3.9mmol/l) (70mg/dl) Based on CGM During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)(16 weeks)
  • Proportion of Time Spent Above Target Glucose (10.0 mmol/l) (180 mg/dl) Based on CGM During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)(16 weeks)
  • Average (mmol/L) of CGM Glucose Levels During the 16 Week Intervention Period(16 weeks)
  • Proportion of Time With Glucose Levels < 3.5 mmol/l (63mg/dl) Based on CGM During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)(16 weeks)
  • Proportion of Time With Glucose Levels in the Significant Hyperglycaemia (Glucose Levels > 16.7 mmol/l) (300mg/dl) Based on CGM During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)(16 weeks)
  • Total Daily Insulin Dose During the 16 Week Intervention Period (Units/Day)(16 weeks)
  • Standard Deviation (mmol/L) of CGM Glucose Levels During the 16 Week Intervention Period(16 weeks)
  • Proportion of Time With Glucose Levels < 3.0 mmol/l (54mg/dl) Based on CGM During the 16 Week Intervention Period (%)(16 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Roman Hovorka

Chief Investigator

University of Cambridge

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials