Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00301171
NCT00301171CompletedNot Applicable

Respiratory Function in Infants With Persistent Wheezing

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)2 sites in 1 country54 target enrollmentStarted: September 2003Last updated:
Conditions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
54
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in FEF75 levels

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Wheezing is a high-pitched whistling sound that is produced when air flows through narrowed lung airways. It is a common symptom of asthma. Persistent wheezing is commonly treated with bronchodilators and inhaled steroids; however, when wheezing is temporarily caused by a virus or exposure to tobacco smoke, this may not be the most effective treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cause of wheezing in infants and children and to assess the effectiveness of inhaled steroids on improving lung function.

Detailed Description

Asthma prevalence has steadily increased in the United States since the early 1980s, with infants and young children showing the largest increase. Some young children experience wheezing, but it is not known if this is related specifically to asthma. Wheezing may be caused by a respiratory syncytial virus, maternal smoking, a family history of asthma, or allergies. In addition, some infants who experience wheezing may have small or dysfunctional airways and may not respond well to commonly prescribed anti-inflammatory medications. Because of the many causes of wheezing, in order to prescribe the most effective treatment, it is necessary to thoroughly assess lung function, allergic sensitization, and airway inflammation. The purpose of this study is to examine the causes of moderate to severe wheezing in infants and assess the infants' response to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The study will also assess new and safer ways to measure lung function and airway inflammation.

This study will enroll infants with moderate to severe persistent wheezing. At study entry, participants will undergo lung function testing, which will include a spirometry test, measures of lung volumes, and assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness. Exhaled breath condensate and blood will be collected, and skin-prick testing will be performed to test for allergies. Participants will then be randomly assigned to receive either fluticasone, an inhaled steroid, or placebo for one month. At the end of the month, lung function testing will be performed and exhaled breath and serum measures will be collected to assess airway inflammation. Participants will attend a follow-up evaluation at age 5 years. During the evaluation, lung function, exhaled breath condensate, and serum markers of inflammation will be measured again, and skin-prick testing will also be performed again.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
Double

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
— to 36 Months (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Moderate to severe persistent wheezing, as defined by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 2
  • No signs of upper or lower respiratory tract infection for at least two weeks prior to study entry

Exclusion Criteria

  • Received therapy with inhaled corticosteroids in the month prior to study entry
  • History of seizures or other neurologic disorders
  • Hypoxemia requiring supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%
  • Underwent a tracheostomy
  • Heart disease
  • Suspected or documented pulmonary hypertension
  • Currently undergoing assisted ventilation
  • Born at less than 36 weeks gestation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in FEF75 levels

Change in RV/TLC ratio

Loss of bronchodilator responsiveness (measured at the end of the one month treatment period and follow-up evaluation when participant is 5 years of age)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in asthma symptom scores (measured at the end of the one month treatment period and follow-up evaluation when participant is 5 years of age)

Investigators

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials