MedPath

Comparison of Continuous Sternal ECG Patch Monitors (Carnation and Zio) Trial

Completed
Conditions
Presyncope
Syncope
Atrial Fibrillation
Supraventricular Tachycardia
Registration Number
NCT02952781
Lead Sponsor
EvergreenHealth
Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to test the clinical value of a new P-wave sensitive recording vector compared to a standard ECG limb lead II vector from similar easy-to-use long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring patch systems, the Carnation TM Ambulatory Monitoring (CAM) System and the Zio-XT iRhythm. The P-wave is a critical aspect of the electrocardiogram. The purpose of this study is to see if the P-wave centric focus of the CAM system improves arrhythmia diagnosis.

Detailed Description

This study is intended to compare the new Carnation patch monitoring system with the Zio patch, which represents the current standard for continuous recording of the ECG over extended periods. The primary endpoint for this comparison will be diagnostic yield with secondary endpoints being ease of use and comfort.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or female

  • Written informed consent

  • Patients with one or more of the following:

    • Syncope of uncertain etiology; or
    • Pre-syncope of uncertain etiology; or
    • Palpitations of uncertain etiology; or
    • Management of known AF/SVT patients
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any dermatitis or infected skin over the sternum (Carnation patch) or left upper anterior thorax (Zio patch).
  • A sternal or thoracic incision that extends under the patch within 3 months from the date of enrollment.
  • Cognitive deficits that would interfere with the subject's ability to give informed consent or perform study testing

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ECG signal quality7 days

ECG signal quality = scoring the ability of each system to record electrical activity from the atrium (P-waves). The Physician Event Committee will independently score the P-waves from all recordings.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Skin comfort or discomfort: Was skin irritated?7 days

User will rate skin comfort on pre-determined scale: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe.

Device Comfort7 days

Was device comfortable to wear? User will rate on a predetermined scale: Very Uncomfortable, Mildly Uncomfortable, Comfortable.

Device Stability and Contact7 days

Did the device stay in place in the chest location where it was attached for the time period indicated? Clinician will evaluate visually, and rate on a predetermined scale: Yes, No.

Diagnostic Yield7 days

Diagnostic Yield: proportion of patients for whom an arrhythmogenic source of symptoms is established or eliminated as a diagnosis.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

EvergreenHealth Heart and Vascular Care

🇺🇸

Kirkland, Washington, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath