Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience Study Phase 2 in Migori County

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Adverse Outcomes
Stress
Stress, Emotional
Healthcare Provider
Quality of Care
Burnout
Discrimination, Social
Maternal Health
Mental Health
Stress, Psychological

Interventions: Behavioral: Training
Behavioral: Peer support and mentorship
Behavioral: Leadership engagement
Behavioral: Embedded champions

Registration Number: NCT05019131

Lead Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco

Brief Summary: The activities described in this proposal are aimed at addressing health care provider stress and unconscious bias to improve quality of maternal health care, particularly related to the person-centered dimensions of care-i.e. care that is respectful and responsive to women's needs, preferences, and values. The investigators focus on health provider stress and unconscious bias because they are key drivers of poor-quality care that are often not addressed in interventions designed to improve quality of maternal health care. The investigators plan to (1) design an intervention that enables providers to identify and manage their stress and unconscious bias; (2) pilot the intervention to assess its feasibility and acceptability; and (3) assess preliminary effect of the intervention on: (a) provider knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to stress and unconscious bias; and (b) provider stress levels.

Detailed Description: Poor person-centered maternal health care (PCMHC) contributes to high maternal and neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and disparities in PCMHC are driving disparities in use of maternal health services., However, little research exists on how to improve PCMHC and reduce disparities. The investigators seek to fill this gap with this project. They propose targeting health provider stress and unconscious bias as fundamental factors driving both poor PCMHC and disparities in PCMHC. Health care provider stress and unconscious bias are important to consider because: (1) providers in low-resource settings often work under very stressful conditions; (2) unconscious bias is prevalent in every society including SSA; and (3) these factors are mutually reinforcing drivers of poor quality care and disparities in person-centered care. In the first phase of the project (CPIPE1), they conducted research to examine (1) the factors associated with PCMHC and identified provider stress and unconscious bias as key contributing factors. They also examined the levels of provider stress and unconscious bias and the types of stressors and biases in Migori County, Kenya. The results of that research will be used to inform this phase (CPIPE2), the aims of which are to: (1) design a multicomponent theory and evidence-based intervention that enables providers to identify and manage their stress and unconscious bias; (2) pilot the intervention to assess its feasibility and acceptability; and (3) assess preliminary effect of the intervention on: (a) provider knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to stress and unconscious bias; and (b) provider stress levels using a pretest-posttest control group design. They will use the results of the pilot to refine the intervention and develop an R01 proposal for a multi-site evaluation with a larger sample and longer follow up to assess impact on PCMHC. This study will yield valuable information to inform quality improvement efforts for PCMHC.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 83

Inclusion Criteria

Providers working in maternity units of the intervention facilities are all eligible.

Exclusion Criteria

Inability to attend scheduled training.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Intervention arm	Training	1. Training: The investigators will develop a training for providers that addresses the following topics: Stress \& positive coping mechanisms; Unconscious bias awareness and mitigation; Person-centered maternity care; Dealing with difficult situations; and Teamwork and communication; 2. Peer support and mentorship: The investigators will identify what works best for these groups in terms of group composition, size, and how the groups want to interact. 3. Leadership engagement: To ensure leadership buy in, support and sustainability of the intervention, the investigators will engage leadership of the County. 4. Embedded champions: To facilitate ongoing engagement, the investigators will identify local leaders, and invite them to training where they will be taught how to facilitate peer support groups and serve as champions.
Intervention arm	Peer support and mentorship	1. Training: The investigators will develop a training for providers that addresses the following topics: Stress \& positive coping mechanisms; Unconscious bias awareness and mitigation; Person-centered maternity care; Dealing with difficult situations; and Teamwork and communication; 2. Peer support and mentorship: The investigators will identify what works best for these groups in terms of group composition, size, and how the groups want to interact. 3. Leadership engagement: To ensure leadership buy in, support and sustainability of the intervention, the investigators will engage leadership of the County. 4. Embedded champions: To facilitate ongoing engagement, the investigators will identify local leaders, and invite them to training where they will be taught how to facilitate peer support groups and serve as champions.
Intervention arm	Embedded champions	1. Training: The investigators will develop a training for providers that addresses the following topics: Stress \& positive coping mechanisms; Unconscious bias awareness and mitigation; Person-centered maternity care; Dealing with difficult situations; and Teamwork and communication; 2. Peer support and mentorship: The investigators will identify what works best for these groups in terms of group composition, size, and how the groups want to interact. 3. Leadership engagement: To ensure leadership buy in, support and sustainability of the intervention, the investigators will engage leadership of the County. 4. Embedded champions: To facilitate ongoing engagement, the investigators will identify local leaders, and invite them to training where they will be taught how to facilitate peer support groups and serve as champions.
Intervention arm	Leadership engagement	1. Training: The investigators will develop a training for providers that addresses the following topics: Stress \& positive coping mechanisms; Unconscious bias awareness and mitigation; Person-centered maternity care; Dealing with difficult situations; and Teamwork and communication; 2. Peer support and mentorship: The investigators will identify what works best for these groups in terms of group composition, size, and how the groups want to interact. 3. Leadership engagement: To ensure leadership buy in, support and sustainability of the intervention, the investigators will engage leadership of the County. 4. Embedded champions: To facilitate ongoing engagement, the investigators will identify local leaders, and invite them to training where they will be taught how to facilitate peer support groups and serve as champions.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	The stress knowledge and attitudes score is measured by 14 survey questions with scores ranging from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge and positive attitudes regarding stress and stress management. We used 13 of the items from the 14-item survey scale. The score range used is 0 to 13- as noted in the limitations section.
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Change in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	The Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure range from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating higher burnout
Change in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	The unconscious bias knowledge and attitudes score is measured by 17 survey questions with scores ranging from 0 to 17. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge and positive attitudes regarding unconscious bias and unconscious bias mitigation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	The explicit bias scores are from responses to a vignette and range from 4 to 28. Higher scores indicate more explicit bias
Change in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	There are no specified cut-offs for cortisol levels, but, on average, higher cortisol levels indicate higher stress.
Change in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 Months	Baseline and 6 months	There are no specified cut-offs for HRV but, on average, lower HRV scores indicate higher stress
Change in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) Score	Baseline and 6 months	IAT scores vary between -2 and +2. For this study, higher positive scores indicates a stronger implicit association between high status with good patient and low status with difficult patient