Conventional versus Computer-assisted techniques for reconstruction of orbitozygomatic fractures
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Injury, Occupational Diseases, PoisoningMusculoskeletal Diseasesorbital trauma, zygomatic fractures
- Registration Number
- PACTR201311000648184
- Lead Sponsor
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Dept. - Cairo University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
Inclusion Criteria
Unilaterally displaced orbitozygomatic complex fractures.
Cases indicated for internal orbital reconstruction.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients where computed tomographies could not be obtained in DICOM format.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Orbital Volume
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Enophthalmos
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the primary clinical endpoints in PACTR201311000648184 comparing computer-assisted and conventional techniques for orbitozygomatic fractures?
How does computer-assisted 3D imaging enhance anatomical accuracy in zygomatic fracture repair versus traditional methods?
Are there biomarkers or patient characteristics predicting better outcomes with computer-assisted versus conventional orbital trauma reconstruction?
What adverse events are associated with computer-assisted maxillofacial surgery for complex fractures and how are they managed?
How do computer-assisted techniques compare to augmented reality-guided approaches in treating orbitozygomatic fractures?