Evaluation of the strategy of applying universal adhesives on non-carious lesions

Phase 2

• Conditions: Dentin Sensitivity: Gingival Retraction; Teeth Wear, Dental Erosion; C07.793.266; C07.465.714.258.447; C07.793.818; C07.793.818.500

• Registration Number: RBR-5f9gps
• Lead Sponsor: CEUMA - Centro Universitário do Maranhão

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2019-09-17
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruitment completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Age between 18 and 70 years; minimum of 4 non-carious cervical lesions per individual; minimum of 20 teeth in occlusion; good oral hygiene; cervical lesions deeper than 1mm; vital teeth; teeth without mobility.

Exclusion Criteria

Endodontically treated teeth; periodontal disease; xerostomia; orthodontic appliance

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Effectiveness of retention of the restorative material based on the protocols used (types of adhesives and types of strategy).<br>IT will be classified according to the criteria in the following scores: FDI (International Dental Federation), classified in: clinically very good; clinically good; clinically sufficient / satisfactory; clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor. And USPHS (United States Public Health Service), classified in: alfa (clinically good), brave (clinically acceptable), and Charlie (clinically poor). The restorations will be evaluated after 6 months.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Restoration effectiveness on marginal staining and marginal adaptation based on the protocols used (types of adhesives and types of strategy).<br>It will be classified according to the criteria in the following scores: FDI (International Dental Federation), classified in: clinically very good; clinically good; clinically sufficient / satisfactory; clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor. And USPHS (United States Public Health Service), classified in: alfa (clinically good), brave (clinically acceptable), and Charlie (clinically poor). The restorations will be evaluated after 6 months.<br><br>;Sensitivity improvement, evaluated by the numerical pain scale (NRS), verified through the air jet for 10 seconds and 2 cm away from the tooth surface, punctuating its pain on a scale of 0 to 4, which will be recorded before the restorative procedure to compare after the immediate clinical course and after six months.