MedPath

Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Pediatric Spina Bifida Neurogenic Bladder

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Neurogenic Bladder Due to Spina Bifida
Registration Number
NCT07136688
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, feasibility, and compliance of a daily home transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (tTNS) protocol in children with chronic neurogenic bladder (NB) provided by self or caregiver for 4 weeks and to estimate the efficacy of tTNS

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • chronic neurogenic bladder
  • Spina Bifida diagnosis
  • Use of overactive bladder medication(s)
  • Stable bladder medications for ≥ 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
  • Progressive SCI (ex: transverse myelitis, polio, etc.)
  • Other lower urinary tract pathology or surgery
  • 2+ pitting edema in the legs that does not resolve
  • Known peripheral neuropathy or injury to the path of the tibial nerve
  • Cancer in the tibial nerve pathway and/or lower urinary tract
  • Inability to elicit the motor response with electric stimulation
  • Inability to complete the tTNS proficiency checklist (guardians)
  • Non-English speaking (guardians)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety as assessed by the number of adverse eventsfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)
Feasibility as assessed by the satisfaction surveysend of study (4 weeks after baseline)

This is an 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree) for a maximum score of 40, higher score indicating greater satisfaction .

Compliance of tTNS usage as assessed by the percent of sessions where toe flexion was elicitedfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)

This will be reported in the TTNS log

Compliance of tTNS usage as assessed by the average current where toe flexion was elicitedfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)

This will be reported in the TTNS log

Compliance of tTNS usage as assessed by percentage of sessions that bladder medications were takenfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)

This will be reported in the TTNS log

Satisfaction as assessed by the surveyend of study (4 weeks after baseline)

This will measure the likelihood of tTNS preference over anticholinergic medication use

This is an 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree) for a maximum score of 40, higher score indicating greater satisfaction .

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of participants that are able to reduce their overactive bladder (OAB) medicationsend of study (4 weeks after baseline)
percent dose reduction (mg ) achievedend of study (4 weeks after baseline)
Change in maximum detrusor pressure (Max Pdet (cmH20)) as assessed by the Urodynamic study (UDS)week 0, week 4
Presence of Detrusor overactivity (DO) as assessed by the Urodynamic study (UDS)Week 4
Change in maximum volume (mL) that bladder can hold before voiding or discomfort as assessed by the Urodynamic study (UDS)Week 0, Week 4
Presence of bladder leak as assessed by the Urodynamic study (UDS)Week 4
Change in bladder sensation as assessed by the Urodynamic study (UDS)Week 0, Week 4

volume infused (mL) at 1) time of reported first sensation of filling, 2) time of reported urgency/desire to void, \& 3) time of reported discomfort

Change in detrusor compliance as assessed by the Urodynamic study (UDS)Week 0, Week 4

reported as change in bladder volume divided by change in bladder pressure.

Number of incontinence episodes as reported in the voiding diaryfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)
Frequency of catheterization as reported in the voiding diaryfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)
Volumes of catheterization as reported in the voiding diaryfrom start of trial to end of trial (4 weeks after start)
Change in bladder symptoms as assessed by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)Week 0, Week 4

This is a 24 item questionnaire that is scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (worst symptoms), maximum score of 96 with higher values indicating greater symptom burden

Change in bowel function as assessed by the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS)Week 0, Week 4

This is a 10 item questionnaire that is scored from 0 (very minor ) to greater than or equal to 14(severe), maximum score range of 0-47 with higher scores indicating worse outcome

Change in general physical and mental health status as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaire for Global HealthWeek 0, Week 4

This is a 10 item questionnaire. The measure yields two standardized summary scores: Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH).Each summary score is calculated based on 4 items from the questionnaire and is converted to a T-score using the PROMIS scoring manual. T-scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, based on the U.S. general population. Higher T-scores indicate better health.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center and Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

The University of Texas Health Science Center and Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Argyrios Stampas, MD,MS
Contact
713-797-5007
Argyrios.Stampas@uth.tmc.edu
Jaqueline Martinez
Contact
713-797-5765
Jacqueline.B.Martinez@uth.tmc.edu

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.