MedPath

Analgesic effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on patients with chronic back pai

Not Applicable
Conditions
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Registration Number
PACTR202004888024754
Lead Sponsor
Charles Ikechukwu Ezema
Brief Summary

The results showed that the reported PI values were significantly lower for TENS patient than sham-TENS patients at immediate post-treatment (M.D = -3, t = -6.616, p = 0.000) and 1 hr times (M.D = -3, t = -6.893, p = 0.000). However, there were no significant differences at 24 hrs or 48 hrs (or at baseline). The correlation between PI, ßE and ME was not significant. It was concluded that TENS application significantly reduces PI but does not cause any significant change in plasma concentration of ßE and ME in patients with CLBP.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Complete
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria

ambulatory male or female patients aged 20–70 years
who had been clinically diagnosed of CLBP resulting from lumbar spondylosis of not less than six months duration
with pain intensity NRS = 5
who were referred for physiotherapy,

Exclusion Criteria

previous use of therapeutic electrical stimulation modality
pregnancy
diabetes
prior lumbar spine surgery
history of cancer, cardiovascular, gynaecological, urological, and neurologic conditions
severe spinal orthopaedic conditions such as pott’s disease, disc protrusion, lumbar (spinal and foramina) stenosis, radiculopathy, and spondylolisthesis > 1 cm
skin lesions between L1 to L5
pain on vertical oscillatory thrust of any spinal vertebrae beyond L1 to L5
pain from hips and sacroiliac joints
implanted electronic device (pacemaker)
use of steroids and central nervous system stimulants

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath