MedPath

Open-label Study Comparing Iberdomide, Daratumumab and Dexamethasone (IberDd) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04975997
Lead Sponsor
Celgene
Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of iberdomide in combination with dexamethasone and daratumumab (IberDd) versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of iberdomide in combination with dexamethasone and daratumumab (IberDd) versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Approximately 200 patients randomized in stage 1 to one of three iberdomide dose levels of 1, 1.3, or 1.6 mg in combination with daratumumab and dexamethasone (Treatment Arms A1, A2, or A3), or to the DVd comparator arm (Treatment Arm B).

In Stage 2 of the study, approximately 664 additional subjects will be randomized 1:1 between 2 treatment arms:

* Approximately 332 subjects will be randomized to receive Treatment Arm A (IberDd)

* Approximately 332 subjects will be randomized to receive Treatment Arm B (DVd)

Participants in both treatment arms will continue to receive treatment until confirmed progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. To ensure accuracy and completeness of the primary endpoint assessment of progression-free survival (PFS), participants who permanently discontinue study treatment for any reason, other than confirmed PD or withdrawal of consent, will continue to be followed for disease assessment.

The study will be conducted in compliance with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) and Good Clinical Practices (GCPs).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
864
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 1DexamethasoneParticipants will receive oral iberdomide, subcutaneous daratumumab and oral dexamethasone.
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 1DaratumumabParticipants will receive oral iberdomide, subcutaneous daratumumab and oral dexamethasone.
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 1IberdomideParticipants will receive oral iberdomide, subcutaneous daratumumab and oral dexamethasone.
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 2Daratumumab-
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 2Iberdomide-
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 2Dexamethasone-
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 3Dexamethasone-
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 3Daratumumab-
Daratumumab in combination with Iberdomide and dexamethasone - Dose 3Iberdomide-
Daratumumab in combination with dexamethasone and bortezomibDexamethasoneParticipants will receive subcutaneous daratumumab, bortezomib and oral dexamethasone
Daratumumab in combination with dexamethasone and bortezomibBortezomibParticipants will receive subcutaneous daratumumab, bortezomib and oral dexamethasone
Daratumumab in combination with dexamethasone and bortezomibDaratumumabParticipants will receive subcutaneous daratumumab, bortezomib and oral dexamethasone
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 5 years

To compare the efficacy of iberdomide (also known as BMS-986382), daratumumab, and dexamethasone (IberDd) to that of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in terms of progression free survival (PFS).

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative Complete Response (CR) at any timeUp to approximately 5 years

To compare the efficacy of iberdomide (also known as BMS-986382), daratumumab, and dexamethasone (IberDd) to that of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in terms of minimal residual disease (MRD) negative complete response (CR) at any time.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 5 years

To evaluate clinical efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with iberdomide, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (IberDd) compared to daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd).

Sustainability of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativityUp to approximately 5 years

To evaluate the sustainability of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity.

Overall Response Rate (ORR)Up to approximately 5 years

Calculated as percentage of participants who achieve best response of partial response (PR) or better according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for multiple myeloma.

Time to response (TTR)Up to approximately 5 years

Time from randomization to the first documentation of response (PR or better).

Duration of Response (DoR)Up to approximately 5 years

Time from the first documentation of response (PR or better) to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time to Progression (TTP)Up to approximately 5 years

The time from randomization to the first documented disease progression.

Progression-free Survival 2 (PFS2)Up to approximately 5 years

Time from randomization to progression on the next anti-myeloma treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

SafetyUp to approximately 5 years

Type, frequency, seriousness and severity of adverse events (AEs), and relationship of AEs to study treatment.

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Up to approximately 5 years

Mean changes from baseline in subscale scores in subject-reported health related quality of life outcomes and multiple myeloma-related symptoms as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.

European Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)Up to approximately 5 years

EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a 20-item myeloma module intended for use among participants varying in disease stage and treatment modality. Mean changes from baseline in subscale scores in subject-reported health related quality of life outcomes and multiple myeloma-related symptoms as measured by the EORTC QLQ- MY20.

Recommended iberdomide dose for Stage 2Up to approximately 1 year
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to tau (AUC(TAU))Up to approximately 1 year
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)Up to approximately 1 year
Time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax)Up to approximately 1 year
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)Up to approximately 5 years

Time from randomization to the start of the next antimyeloma treatment.

Trial Locations

Locations (259)

Local Institution - 035

🇺🇸

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Local Institution - 641

🇺🇸

Cerritos, California, United States

Local Institution - 681

🇺🇸

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Local Institution - 047

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Local Institution - 684

🇺🇸

Newport, California, United States

Local Institution - 033

🇺🇸

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Local Institution - 029

🇺🇸

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Local Institution - 693

🇺🇸

Ocala, Florida, United States

Local Institution - 028

🇺🇸

Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States

Local Institution - 045

🇺🇸

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Scroll for more (249 remaining)
Local Institution - 035
🇺🇸Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.