跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07551024
NCT07551024招募中不适用

Evaluation of Zygomatic Implant Placement Accuracy Using Fully Metallic vs Resin-based Surgical Guides in Severely Atrophic Maxilla.

Future University in Egypt1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 4 人开始时间: 2025年11月3日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
4
试验地点
1
主要终点
Implant placement accuracy

研究概览

简要总结

Some patients lose a large amount of bone in the upper jaw. When this happens, it can be difficult to place regular dental implants. In these cases, special implants called zygomatic implants can be used. These implants are longer than normal implants and are fixed in the cheekbone, which usually has enough bone to support them. They can help support fixed teeth for patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw.

Placing zygomatic implants requires careful planning and high accuracy. To help guide the surgeon during the operation, a surgical guide can be used. A surgical guide is a custom-made device that helps the surgeon place the implant in the planned position.

Surgical guides can be made from different materials. The most common type is made from resin (a strong plastic material) using 3D printing. Recently, fully metallic surgical guides have been developed. These metal guides may be stronger and more stable during surgery, but it is not yet clear if they improve the accuracy of implant placement.

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of metal surgical guides and resin surgical guides when placing zygomatic implants in patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw.

Patients included in the study will undergo a clinical examination and a CT scan before surgery to plan the implant positions. During the surgery, each patient will receive zygomatic implants on both sides of the upper jaw. On one side, the implants will be placed using a metal surgical guide, and on the other side, they will be placed using a resin surgical guide. This allows the two types of guides to be compared in the same patient.

After the surgery, another CT scan will be taken to check the final position of the implants. The planned implant position will be compared with the actual position after surgery to measure the accuracy of placement.

The results of this study will help determine whether metallic surgical guides or resin surgical guides provide better accuracy when placing zygomatic implants.

Participation in this study is voluntary. All patients will receive full information about the study and will sign a consent form before participating.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients ≥18 years with severely atrophic maxilla.
  • Acquired maxillary defects resulting from trauma, pathology, or previous surgical resection.
  • Indicated for zygomatic implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
  • Sufficient mouth opening for zygomatic implants placement.
  • Patients willing to sign informed consent and attend follow-ups.

排除标准

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease affecting healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, etc).
  • Heavy smokers
  • Previous radiotherapy or bisphosphonate therapy.
  • Active sinus or nasal infection.
  • Severe parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism).
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders affecting compliance.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group B (Metallic nickel Guide)

Active Comparator

CT scan and digital planning will be used. A metallic surgical guide (made of nickel using CAD/CAM technology) will be created.

, the zygomatic implant will be placed using this metallic guide on one side.

干预措施: Group B (Metallic nickel Guide) (Device)

Group A (Resin Guide)

Active Comparator

CT scan and a digital impression of the mouth will be taken. A resin surgical guide (made with biocompatible 3D-printed material) will be created to guide the implant placement. On the assigned side, the zygomatic implant will be placed using this resin guide

干预措施: Resin surgical Guide (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Implant placement accuracy

时间窗: from enrolment to the implant placement at 4 weeks

Measured by deviation (mm, degrees) between planned and placed implant positions (CT superimposition) using computer software Using Real Guide. on each side for assessment for accuracy of implant placement in each group

次要结局

  • Intraoperative Complications(from enrolment to the time of surgery 2 weeks)
  • Surgical time(measured intraoperatively during surgery)
  • primary stability(from time of enrolment to time of surgery 2 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Omar Elawady

principle investigator

Future University in Egypt

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验