跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05790317
NCT05790317已完成不适用

Comparıson Of The Effects Of The Eras Protocol Applıcatıon And The Effects Of The Tradıtıonal Method On The In Obesıty Surgery

Bahçeşehir University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 128 人开始时间: 2022年2月14日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
128
试验地点
2
主要终点
Presence of post-operative nausea, vomiting and retching

研究概览

简要总结

This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of care based on the "Accelerated Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol" and the traditional method in bariatric surgery and demonstrate the difference the two methods based on evidence.

详细描述

The population of the study consisted of 700 patients over the age of 18 who underwent bariatric surgery in the Obesity Surgery Clinic of a private hospital in 2022. The sample of the study included 128 patients who were willing to undergo bariatric surgery between April 15-July 31, 2022, were in compliance with the research criteria and were voluntarily over the age of 18, 64 in the control and 64 in the experimental group. 128 patients in the sample were assigned to 2 groups using a computer program that generates random numbers. For the purpose of the research, groups were coded as groups A and B, and two different surgical preparations and surgical procedures were applied to the patients in the group. The effects of two different surgical method preparations and the surgical process on the patient's recovery were compared. In the study, the data were collected with the personal introduction form introducing the characteristics of the patients, the Rhodes Nausea-Vomiting and Regurgitation Index (WPI), the Mcgill Pain Scale and the Postoperative Evaluation Form created within the scope of the ERAS Accelerated Care Protocol. Permission was obtained for the scales, and the content validity calculation of the Postoperative Evaluation Form was made in line with the evaluations of the field experts consisting of physicians and nurses experienced in the ERAS Rapid Care Protocol. The data were analyzed in SPSS Package Program. While calculating frequency, percentage and standard deviation in the evaluation of the data, comparisons between groups were made with the independent sample t-test, and p≤ 0.05 was taken as the significance value of the findings.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 64 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18-65 years of age who underwent bariatric surgery
  • Open to communication and collaborative,
  • Patients who volunteered to take part in the study

排除标准

  • Patients with major visual, hearing and speech impairments
  • Patients who want to withdraw from the study at any stage of the study

结局指标

主要结局

Presence of post-operative nausea, vomiting and retching

时间窗: 3 days

Postoperative nausea, vomiting and retching were evaluated with the "Rhodes Nausea-Vomiting Rectal Index". According to the sub-dimensions of the scale, each of the symptoms of nausea, vomiting and retching was scored in the range of 0-12 points. 0 meant the least distress - 12 meant the most distress.

Presence and level of postoperative pain

时间窗: 3 days

In the sample calculation of the research; To measure the significant differences between independent groups, a minimum of 128 samples is required (64 for each group) in order to determine 80% statistical power and α = 0.05 significance and d = 0.50 effect size in the t-test to be performed. In order to evaluate the effect of the post-operative accelerated recovery (ERAS) protocol on the patient recovery process, 128 patients who applied to the hospital for bariatric surgery between April and June 2022 were included in the study. 64 patients were divided into groups as the ERAS Protocol group and 64 patients as the control group. Postoperative pain status was evaluated with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). In determining the severity of pain, the McGill Pain Scale Numerical Evaluation was evaluated as 0-10 points, 0 no pain, 10 unbearable pain. A score of 4 or less for patients meant less pain.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Bahçeşehir University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Eylul Tulay Aykul

training nurse

Bahçeşehir University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of the Effect of Traditional Method and... | 临床试验