Experimentation of Sensorized Pseudoelastic Orthoses Produced by Additive Manufacturing
- Conditions
- Acquired Brain Injury
- Registration Number
- NCT04328857
- Lead Sponsor
- IRCCS Eugenio Medea
- Brief Summary
The proposed clinical investigation plan is a pivotal controlled study with two parallel groups, has a total duration of 12 months and involves the recruitment of 34 pediatric patients suffering from acquired brain injury.
The primary objective of the clinical study is to evaluate the improvement of joint stiffness through the use of sensorized pseudoelastic orthoses for the rehabilitation of pediatric patients with acquired brain injury.
The effectiveness of the treatment in terms of joint stiffness (primary outcome) will be assessed and the effect of the treatment will be quantified with clinical evaluation scales and instrumental measurements by means of an optoelectronic system and isokinetic machine. The tolerability and acceptability of the device will also be checked.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 34
- Quadriplegia or acquired hemiplegia.
- Age 6-20 years.
- Dystonic, dyskinetic, spastic.
- Chronic phase patients (> 1 year post event).
- Spastic syndrome with Ashworth Score (AS) for the limb of interest> 1.
- Collaborative.
- Fixed limitations of the joint.
- Joint pain.
- Skin allergies.
- Behavioral and psychiatric disorders (eg, emotional problems, anxiety, panic attacks).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Joint Stiffness of affected upper limb joint After 4 weeks of treatment Quantitative measure performed by means of an isokinetic machine (Unit of measure: Nm/°). Changes in joint stiffness following the use of new customized devices during a rehabilitation treatment period. Lower stiffness is better.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Melbourne Upper Limb Assessment 2 After 4 weeks of treatment Clinical scale for evaluating quality of upper limb movement (16 items, each assessed from 0 to 4 points). Result reported in %. Higher is better.
Range of motion of target joint during a pointing-forward task After 4 weeks of treatment Measured in degrees. A kinematic analysis will be performed during a pointing-forward task using an optoelectronic system.
Active range of motion After 4 weeks of treatment Measured with goniometer in degrees.
Passive range of motion After 4 weeks of treatment Measured with goniometer in degrees.
Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test After 4 weeks of treatment Clinical scale evaluating the quality of upper extremity function (33 items, 4 domains). Minimum score 0, maximum score 100. Higher is better.
Modified Ashworth Scale After 4 weeks of treatment Clinical scale for spasticity (5 levels), higher is worse.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
IRCCS Eugenio Medea
🇮🇹Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy
IRCCS Eugenio Medea🇮🇹Bosisio Parini, LC, ItalyElena Beretta, MDContact+39031877111elena.beretta@lanostrafamiglia.itFabio A StormSub Investigator